Model Comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Non-reasoning)
vs. Grok 3
Comparing 2 AI models · 12 benchmarks · Anthropic, xAI
Recommended Pick
xA Grok 3 11 metric wins Strongest on: Value, Reasoning, Math
Best Value
Grok 3
100.0 value score
47.9 reasoning / $8.00/1M
Lowest Price
Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Non-reasoning)
$3.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Grok 3
47.9 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Non-reasoning)
26.7 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
Grok 3 has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) is 1.3x cheaper on input tokens than Grok 3.
Reasoning gap
Grok 3 leads Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) by 12.2 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) leads Grok 3 by 6.9 points on coding.
Top-pick rationale
Grok 3 wins 11 measurable categories, including Value, Reasoning, Math, GPQA.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Non-reasoning)
Anthropic
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Grok 3
xAI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | An Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) | Top Pick xA Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $3.00/1M | $4.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $15.00/1M | $20.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $6.00/1M | $8.00/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Anthropic | xAI |
| Release Date | Feb 24, 2025 | Feb 19, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | — |
| TTFT | — | — |
| Latency | — | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 99.5 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 35.8 | 47.9 |
| Intelligence | 30.8 | 25.2 |
| Coding | 26.7 | 19.8 |
| Math | 21.0 | 58.0 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 65.6% | 69.3% |
| MMLU Pro | 80.3% | 79.9% |
| HLE | 4.8% | 5.1% |
| LiveCodeBench | 39.4% | 42.5% |
| MATH 500 | 85.0% | 87.0% |
| AIME 2025 | 21.0% | 58.0% |
| AIME (Original) | 22.3% | 33.0% |
| SciCode | 37.6% | 36.8% |
| LCR | 48.3% | 54.7% |
| IFBench | 44.0% | 46.9% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 50.0% | 48.8% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 21.2% | 11.4% |
Key Takeaways
Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) offers the best value at $3.00/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Grok 3 has the strongest reasoning profile with a 47.9 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) reaches a 26.7 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Non-reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Code generation
- Software development
Grok 3
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
