AI Model Ranking (LLM Leaderboard)

Most Intelligent AI Models

Language models ranked by Artificial Analysis Index

Model
AI model name and provider organization
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index - composite reasoning and capability score across the benchmark suite
Value Score
Quality, speed, and blended token price combined into a relative value score
Speed
Inference throughput in tokens per second - how fast the model generates responses
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude Fable 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Opus 4.8 Fallback)
#1 Claude Fable 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Opus 4.8 Fallback)
by Anthropic Β· Jun 9, 2026
59.9970 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Sol (max)
#2 GPT-5.6 Sol (max)
by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026
58.91274 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Sol (xhigh)
#3 GPT-5.6 Sol (xhigh)
by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026
57.71265 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Sol (high)
#4 GPT-5.6 Sol (high)
by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026
55.91163 tok/s
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude Opus 4.8 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
#5 Claude Opus 4.8 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
by Anthropic Β· May 28, 2026
55.71257 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Terra (max)
#6 GPT-5.6 Terra (max)
by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026
55.026170 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.5 (xhigh)
#7 GPT-5.5 (xhigh)
by OpenAI Β· Apr 23, 2026
54.81285 tok/s
SpaceXAI AI provider logo - Grok 4.5 (high)
#8 Grok 4.5 (high)
by SpaceXAI Β· Jul 8, 2026
53.835133 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Sol (medium)
#9 GPT-5.6 Sol (medium)
by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026
53.61166 tok/s
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
#10 Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
by Anthropic Β· Apr 16, 2026
53.51152 tok/s
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude Sonnet 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
#11 Claude Sonnet 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
by Anthropic Β· Jun 30, 2026
53.42186 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.5 (high)
#12 GPT-5.5 (high)
by OpenAI Β· Apr 23, 2026
53.11172 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Terra (xhigh)
#13 GPT-5.6 Terra (xhigh)
by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026
51.624134 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.4 (xhigh)
#14 GPT-5.4 (xhigh)
by OpenAI Β· Mar 5, 2026
51.424171 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Luna (max)
#15 GPT-5.6 Luna (max)
by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026
51.238259 tok/s
Z AI AI provider logo - GLM-5.2 (max)
#16 GLM-5.2 (max)
by Z AI Β· Jun 16, 2026
51.139169 tok/s
Meta AI provider logo - Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh)
#17 Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh)
by Meta Β· Jul 9, 2026
50.640129 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.5 (medium)
#18 GPT-5.5 (medium)
by OpenAI Β· Apr 23, 2026
50.41065 tok/s
Google AI provider logo - Gemini 3.5 Flash (high)
#19 Gemini 3.5 Flash (high)
by Google Β· May 19, 2026
50.231247 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Sol (low)
#20 GPT-5.6 Sol (low)
by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026
49.41064 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Luna (xhigh)
#21 GPT-5.6 Luna (xhigh)
by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026
49.137219 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Terra (high)
#22 GPT-5.6 Terra (high)
by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026
49.023133 tok/s
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
#23 Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
by Anthropic Β· Feb 17, 2026
47.21372 tok/s
Google AI provider logo - Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
#24 Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
by Google Β· Feb 19, 2026
46.524137 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Luna (high)
#25 GPT-5.6 Luna (high)
by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026
46.134207 tok/s
Alibaba AI provider logo - Qwen3.7 Max
#26 Qwen3.7 Max
by Alibaba Β· May 19, 2026
46.027203 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Terra (medium)
#27 GPT-5.6 Terra (medium)
by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026
45.621129 tok/s
Google AI provider logo - Gemini 3.5 Flash (medium)
#28 Gemini 3.5 Flash (medium)
by Google Β· May 19, 2026
45.428236 tok/s
MiniMax AI provider logo - M3
#29 M3
by MiniMax Β· Jun 1, 2026
44.458105 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.3 Codex (xhigh)
#30 GPT-5.3 Codex (xhigh)
by OpenAI Β· Feb 5, 2026
44.319103 tok/s
DeepSeek AI provider logo - V4 Pro (Reasoning, Max Effort)
#31 V4 Pro (Reasoning, Max Effort)
by DeepSeek Β· Apr 24, 2026
44.34065 tok/s
Kimi AI provider logo - K2.6
#32 K2.6
by Kimi Β· Apr 20, 2026
44.22338 tok/s
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
#33 Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
by Anthropic Β· Feb 5, 2026
43.7953 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.5 (low)
#34 GPT-5.5 (low)
by OpenAI Β· Apr 23, 2026
43.5971 tok/s
Meta AI provider logo - Muse Spark
#35 Muse Spark
by Meta Β· Apr 8, 2026
43.1N/AN/A
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)
#36 Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)
by Anthropic Β· Apr 16, 2026
42.7945 tok/s
Xiaomi AI provider logo - MiMo-V2.5-Pro
#37 MiMo-V2.5-Pro
by Xiaomi Β· Apr 22, 2026
42.23857 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.2 (xhigh)
#38 GPT-5.2 (xhigh)
by OpenAI Β· Dec 11, 2025
42.21585 tok/s
Kimi AI provider logo - K2.7 Code
#39 K2.7 Code
by Kimi Β· Jun 12, 2026
41.92143 tok/s
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)
#40 Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)
by Anthropic Β· Jun 30, 2026
41.71462 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Sol (Non-reasoning)
#41 GPT-5.6 Sol (Non-reasoning)
by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026
41.2839 tok/s
Tencent AI provider logo - Hy3
#42 Hy3
by Tencent Β· Jul 6, 2026
41.2N/A54 tok/s
Nex AGI AI provider logo - Nex-N2-Pro
#43 Nex-N2-Pro
by Nex AGI Β· Jun 2, 2026
41.046134 tok/s
DeepSeek AI provider logo - V4 Pro (Reasoning, High Effort)
#44 V4 Pro (Reasoning, High Effort)
by DeepSeek Β· Apr 24, 2026
40.83762 tok/s
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning)
#45 Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning)
by Anthropic Β· Nov 24, 2025
40.8960 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Terra (low)
#46 GPT-5.6 Terra (low)
by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026
40.519129 tok/s
DeepSeek AI provider logo - V4 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort)
#47 V4 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort)
by DeepSeek Β· Apr 24, 2026
40.3100116 tok/s
Xiaomi AI provider logo - MiMo-V2-Pro
#48 MiMo-V2-Pro
by Xiaomi Β· Mar 18, 2026
40.3N/AN/A
Z AI AI provider logo - GLM-5.1 (Reasoning)
#49 GLM-5.1 (Reasoning)
by Z AI Β· Apr 7, 2026
40.22082 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.2 Codex (xhigh)
#50 GPT-5.2 Codex (xhigh)
by OpenAI Β· Dec 11, 2025
40.120150 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.4 mini (xhigh)
#51 GPT-5.4 mini (xhigh)
by OpenAI Β· Mar 17, 2026
40.034176 tok/s
Alibaba AI provider logo - Qwen3.6 Max Preview
#52 Qwen3.6 Max Preview
by Alibaba Β· Apr 20, 2026
40.01641 tok/s
SpaceXAI AI provider logo - Grok Build 0.1 0616
#53 Grok Build 0.1 0616
by SpaceXAI Β· N/A
39.82452 tok/s
Alibaba AI provider logo - Qwen3.6 Plus
#54 Qwen3.6 Plus
by Alibaba Β· Apr 2, 2026
39.62553 tok/s
Google AI provider logo - Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high)
#55 Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high)
by Google Β· Nov 18, 2025
39.613N/A
Z AI AI provider logo - GLM-5 (Reasoning)
#56 GLM-5 (Reasoning)
by Z AI Β· Feb 11, 2026
39.52151 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.4 (low)
#57 GPT-5.4 (low)
by OpenAI Β· Mar 5, 2026
39.117117 tok/s
Alibaba AI provider logo - Qwen3.7 Plus
#58 Qwen3.7 Plus
by Alibaba Β· Jun 1, 2026
39.03151 tok/s
China Mobile AI provider logo - JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B
#59 JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B
by China Mobile Β· Jul 9, 2026
38.8N/AN/A
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.4 nano (xhigh)
#60 GPT-5.4 nano (xhigh)
by OpenAI Β· Mar 17, 2026
38.263164 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Luna (medium)
#61 GPT-5.6 Luna (medium)
by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026
38.128200 tok/s
MiniMax AI provider logo - M2.7
#62 M2.7
by MiniMax Β· Mar 18, 2026
38.13554 tok/s
Z AI AI provider logo - GLM-5-Turbo
#63 GLM-5-Turbo
by Z AI Β· Mar 15, 2026
38.1N/AN/A
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.2 (medium)
#64 GPT-5.2 (medium)
by OpenAI Β· Dec 11, 2025
38.012N/A
NVIDIA AI provider logo - Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning)
#65 Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning)
by NVIDIA Β· Jun 4, 2026
37.839199 tok/s
Google AI provider logo - Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Reasoning)
#66 Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Reasoning)
by Google Β· Dec 17, 2025
37.840212 tok/s
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)
#67 Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)
by Anthropic Β· Feb 5, 2026
37.8845 tok/s
SpaceXAI AI provider logo - Grok 4.3 (high)
#68 Grok 4.3 (high)
by SpaceXAI Β· Apr 30, 2026
37.634132 tok/s
DeepSeek AI provider logo - V4 Flash (Reasoning, High Effort)
#69 V4 Flash (Reasoning, High Effort)
by DeepSeek Β· Apr 24, 2026
37.460N/A
Xiaomi AI provider logo - MiMo-V2.5
#70 MiMo-V2.5
by Xiaomi Β· Apr 22, 2026
37.27190 tok/s
Alibaba AI provider logo - Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)
#71 Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)
by Alibaba Β· Apr 22, 2026
37.12158 tok/s
SpaceXAI AI provider logo - Grok 4.20 0309 v2 (Reasoning)
#72 Grok 4.20 0309 v2 (Reasoning)
by SpaceXAI Β· Apr 7, 2026
37.024178 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.1 (high)
#73 GPT-5.1 (high)
by OpenAI Β· Nov 13, 2025
36.922123 tok/s
SpaceXAI AI provider logo - Grok 4.20 0309 (Reasoning)
#74 Grok 4.20 0309 (Reasoning)
by SpaceXAI Β· Mar 10, 2026
36.514N/A
Xiaomi AI provider logo - MiMo-V2-Omni-0327
#75 MiMo-V2-Omni-0327
by Xiaomi Β· Mar 27, 2026
36.4N/AN/A
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Reasoning)
#76 Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Reasoning)
by Anthropic Β· Sep 29, 2025
36.41053 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5 Codex (high)
#77 GPT-5 Codex (high)
by OpenAI Β· Sep 23, 2025
36.122169 tok/s
SpaceXAI AI provider logo - Grok 4.3 (medium)
#78 Grok 4.3 (medium)
by SpaceXAI Β· Apr 30, 2026
36.029112 tok/s
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)
#79 Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)
by Anthropic Β· Feb 17, 2026
35.91049 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.5 (Non-reasoning)
#80 GPT-5.5 (Non-reasoning)
by OpenAI Β· Apr 23, 2026
35.4766 tok/s
SpaceXAI AI provider logo - Grok 4.3 (low)
#81 Grok 4.3 (low)
by SpaceXAI Β· Apr 30, 2026
35.429114 tok/s
Z AI AI provider logo - GLM-5.1 (Non-reasoning)
#82 GLM-5.1 (Non-reasoning)
by Z AI Β· Apr 7, 2026
35.41662 tok/s
Kimi AI provider logo - K2.5 (Reasoning)
#83 K2.5 (Reasoning)
by Kimi Β· Jan 27, 2026
35.42249 tok/s
Xiaomi AI provider logo - MiMo-V2-Omni
#84 MiMo-V2-Omni
by Xiaomi Β· Mar 19, 2026
35.0N/AN/A
Google AI provider logo - Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal)
#85 Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal)
by Google Β· May 19, 2026
34.921220 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5 (high)
#86 GPT-5 (high)
by OpenAI Β· Aug 7, 2025
34.718105 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.1 Codex (high)
#87 GPT-5.1 Codex (high)
by OpenAI Β· Nov 13, 2025
34.721180 tok/s
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning)
#88 Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning)
by Anthropic Β· Nov 24, 2025
34.7753 tok/s
Kimi AI provider logo - K2.6 (Non-reasoning)
#89 K2.6 (Non-reasoning)
by Kimi Β· Apr 20, 2026
34.61838 tok/s
Z AI AI provider logo - GLM 5V Turbo (Reasoning)
#90 GLM 5V Turbo (Reasoning)
by Z AI Β· Apr 1, 2026
34.5N/AN/A
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low Effort)
#91 Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low Effort)
by Anthropic Β· Feb 17, 2026
34.3948 tok/s
Z AI AI provider logo - GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)
#92 GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)
by Z AI Β· Jun 16, 2026
34.118107 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning)
#93 GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning)
by OpenAI Β· Jul 9, 2026
34.015118 tok/s
Alibaba AI provider logo - Qwen3.5 27B (Reasoning)
#94 Qwen3.5 27B (Reasoning)
by Alibaba Β· Feb 24, 2026
33.82680 tok/s
KwaiKAT AI provider logo - KAT Coder Pro V2
#95 KAT Coder Pro V2
by KwaiKAT Β· Mar 27, 2026
33.731N/A
Alibaba AI provider logo - Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning)
#96 Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning)
by Alibaba Β· Feb 16, 2026
33.71960 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5 (medium)
#97 GPT-5 (medium)
by OpenAI Β· Aug 7, 2025
33.71484 tok/s
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude 4.1 Opus (Reasoning)
#98 Claude 4.1 Opus (Reasoning)
by Anthropic Β· Aug 5, 2025
33.7438 tok/s
MiniMax AI provider logo - M2.5
#99 M2.5
by MiniMax Β· Feb 12, 2026
33.73379 tok/s
Z AI AI provider logo - GLM-4.7 (Reasoning)
#100 GLM-4.7 (Reasoning)
by Z AI Β· Dec 22, 2025
33.731102 tok/s

Showing 100 of 573 models

Understanding the AI Model Leaderboard

This comprehensive AI model leaderboard helps you compare and choose the best large language models (LLMs) for your needs. We track standardized AI benchmarks, token pricing, inference speed, and model capabilities across all major AI providers like OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta, and DeepSeek.

Core AI Benchmarks Explained

MMLU-ProTests broad knowledge across 14 academic subjects
GPQAPhD-level reasoning & problem-solving
AIME 2025Elite mathematical reasoning
Coding IndexLiveCodeBench + SciCode composite
Math IndexAIME + MATH-500 composite

Key Metrics to Consider

Token PricingInput vs output cost per 1M tokens
Inference SpeedTokens/sec for response time
Release DateLatest techniques & knowledge
Benchmark Scores0-100% capability comparison

How to Choose the Right AI Model for Your Use Case

For Research & Analysis

Prioritize models with high MMLU-Pro (70%+) and GPQA (60%+) scores for complex reasoning tasks, academic research, and technical documentation

For Cost Optimization

Sort by input/output pricing - smaller models often deliver 80% of flagship performance at 10% of the cost for simple tasks

For Math & STEM

Filter by Math Index or AIME 2025 scores (50%+) for quantitative analysis, engineering calculations, and scientific applications

All benchmark scores and pricing data are updated daily from Artificial Analysis to reflect the latest model versions and capabilities. Use the sort filters above to find AI models by intelligence, cost, coding ability, math performance, speed, or release date.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is MMLU-Pro and why is it the standard AI intelligence benchmark?

MMLU-Pro (Massive Multitask Language Understanding - Professional) is the most comprehensive AI benchmark, testing models across 14 academic subjects including mathematics, science, history, law, and ethics. Scores range from 46% (basic competency) to 87% (near-expert level). Models scoring above 75% demonstrate strong general intelligence suitable for professional applications, while scores below 60% indicate limitations in complex reasoning tasks.

What does GPQA measure and which models score highest?

GPQA (Graduate-level Google-Proof Q&A) tests PhD-level reasoning with questions designed to be "Google-proof" - requiring deep understanding rather than simple fact retrieval. Top models like GPT-5.1 (87.3%), GPT-5 mini (82.8%), and o3 (82.7%) excel at GPQA, making them ideal for research, technical analysis, and complex problem-solving. Models below 50% GPQA struggle with advanced reasoning and may provide superficial answers to complex questions.

What is AIME 2025 and how does it evaluate AI mathematical ability?

AIME 2025 (American Invitational Mathematics Examination) is an elite math competition benchmark that tests advanced problem-solving, algebra, geometry, and number theory. Scores above 80% (like GPT-5 Codex at 98.7% or GPT-5.1 at 94%) indicate exceptional mathematical reasoning suitable for engineering, scientific computing, and quantitative analysis. Models scoring below 50% may struggle with multi-step mathematical problems or require explicit problem breakdown.

How is AI model pricing calculated and what's considered cost-effective?

AI model pricing is measured per 1 million tokens (approximately 750,000 words). Input pricing covers text you send, while output pricing covers generated responses. Budget models like Llama 3.3 70B cost $0.54/$0.71 per million tokens, mid-tier models like GPT-5 nano cost $0.05/$0.40, while premium models like GPT-5 cost $1.25/$10. For typical applications with 3:1 input-to-output ratio, budget models can be 10-20x cheaper than flagship models while maintaining 70-80% performance.

Which AI models are best for coding and programming tasks?

Sort by Coding Index to see top programming models. Our Coding Index combines LiveCodeBench, SciCode, and coding benchmarks. Top performers include GPT-5.1 (57.5 index), GPT-5 mini (51.4), and GPT-5 Codex (53.5). These models excel at code generation, debugging, refactoring, and explaining complex algorithms. For budget-conscious developers, models with 40+ coding index scores offer excellent value for routine programming tasks.

How often are AI model benchmarks and rankings updated?

Our leaderboard syncs daily with Artificial Analysis API to ensure benchmark scores (MMLU-Pro, GPQA, AIME 2025), pricing, and inference speed data reflect the latest model versions. New model releases appear immediately under the "Newest" sort option. Benchmark scores can change when providers release updated versions - for example, GPT-5.1 released in November 2025 achieved 69.7 intelligence compared to GPT-5's 68.5 from August 2025.

What inference speed (tokens/second) do I need for my application?

Inference speed determines how fast models generate responses. For real-time chatbots and interactive applications, target 100+ tokens/second (models like gpt-oss-120B at 340 tok/s). For background processing and batch jobs, 50-100 tok/s is sufficient. Premium reasoning models like GPT-5 (103 tok/s) balance speed and capability. Note that higher inference speed doesn't always mean better quality - slower models often deliver more thoughtful, detailed responses.

Can I test these AI models for free before committing?

Yes! Try our free AI chat interface to test different models instantly without creating an account. Many providers also offer free tiers: OpenAI (ChatGPT with daily limits), Anthropic (Claude with usage caps), Google (Gemini free tier), and open-source models like Llama 3.3. Compare performance on your specific use case before upgrading to paid plans.