Model Comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning)
vs. Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct
Comparing 2 AI models · 12 benchmarks · Anthropic, MoonshotAI
Recommended Pick
An Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning) 14 metric wins Strongest on: Reasoning, Intelligence, Coding
Lowest Price
Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning)
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning)
52.9 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning)
27.6 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Reasoning gap
Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning) leads Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct by 27.9 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning) leads Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct by 13.4 points on coding.
Top-pick rationale
Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning) wins 14 measurable categories, including Reasoning, Intelligence, Coding, Math.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning)
Anthropic
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct
MoonshotAI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick An Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning) | Mo Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.00/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.00/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Anthropic | MoonshotAI |
| Release Date | Feb 24, 2025 | Oct 30, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | — |
| TTFT | — | — |
| Latency | — | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Reasoning Score | 52.9 | 25.0 |
| Intelligence | 27.1 | 8.5 |
| Coding | 27.6 | 14.2 |
| Math | 56.3 | 36.3 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 77.2% | 41.2% |
| MMLU Pro | 83.7% | 58.5% |
| HLE | 10.3% | 2.7% |
| LiveCodeBench | 47.3% | 37.8% |
| MATH 500 | 94.7% | — |
| AIME 2025 | 56.3% | 36.3% |
| AIME (Original) | 48.7% | — |
| SciCode | 40.3% | 19.9% |
| LCR | 60.7% | 25.7% |
| IFBench | 48.3% | 28.1% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 54.7% | 0.0% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 21.2% | 11.4% |
Key Takeaways
Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning) offers the best value at $0.00/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 52.9 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning) reaches a 27.6 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct
- General-purpose AI
- Versatile applications
