Model Comparison
Claude 3 Haiku
vs. MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning)
Comparing 2 AI models · 10 benchmarks · Anthropic, Xiaomi
Recommended Pick
Xi MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning) 11 metric wins Strongest on: Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence
Best Value
Claude 3 Haiku
100.0 value score
18.8 reasoning / $0.50/1M
Lowest Price
Claude 3 Haiku
$0.25/1M input price
Best Reasoning
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning)
41.7 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning)
36.8 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
Claude 3 Haiku has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Claude 3 Haiku is 3.6x cheaper on input tokens than MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning).
Reasoning gap
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning) leads Claude 3 Haiku by 22.9 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning) leads Claude 3 Haiku by 30.1 points on coding.
Top-pick rationale
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning) wins 11 measurable categories, including Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence, Coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Claude 3 Haiku
Anthropic
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning)
Xiaomi
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | An Claude 3 Haiku | Top Pick Xi MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.25/1M | $0.90/1M |
| Output Cost | $1.25/1M | $2.70/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.50/1M | $1.35/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Anthropic | Xiaomi |
| Release Date | Mar 4, 2024 | Apr 22, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | 44.7 tok/s |
| TTFT | — | 2683ms |
| Latency | — | 2683ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 82.2 |
| Reasoning Score | 18.8 | 41.7 |
| Intelligence | 12.3 | 35.6 |
| Coding | 6.7 | 36.8 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 37.4% | 76.2% |
| HLE | 3.9% | 13.3% |
| LiveCodeBench | 15.4% | — |
| MATH 500 | 39.4% | — |
| AIME (Original) | 1.0% | — |
| SciCode | 18.6% | 39.1% |
| LCR | 21.0% | 35.0% |
| IFBench | 36.1% | 42.7% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 21.1% | 72.5% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 0.8% | 35.6% |
Key Takeaways
Claude 3 Haiku offers the best value at $0.25/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 41.7 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning) reaches a 36.8 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Claude 3 Haiku
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
