Model Comparison
Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Non-reasoning)
vs. Coder V2 Lite Instruct
Comparing 2 AI models · 10 benchmarks · Anthropic, DeepSeek
Recommended Pick
An Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) 8 metric wins Strongest on: Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence
Lowest Price
Coder V2 Lite Instruct
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Non-reasoning)
38.2 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Non-reasoning)
33.5 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
Coder V2 Lite Instruct is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Non-reasoning).
Reasoning gap
Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) leads Coder V2 Lite Instruct by 22.9 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) wins 8 measurable categories, including Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence, GPQA.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Non-reasoning)
Anthropic
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Coder V2 Lite Instruct
DeepSeek
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick An Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) | De Coder V2 Lite Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $3.75/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $15.00/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $6.56/1M | — |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Anthropic | DeepSeek |
| Release Date | Sep 29, 2025 | Jun 17, 2024 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 59.6 tok/s | — |
| TTFT | 1318ms | — |
| Latency | 1318ms | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | — |
| Reasoning Score | 38.2 | 15.2 |
| Intelligence | 37.1 | 8.5 |
| Coding | 33.5 | — |
| Math | 37.0 | — |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 72.7% | 31.9% |
| MMLU Pro | 86.0% | 42.9% |
| HLE | 7.1% | 5.3% |
| LiveCodeBench | 59.0% | 15.8% |
| AIME 2025 | 37.0% | — |
| SciCode | 42.8% | 13.9% |
| LCR | 51.3% | — |
| IFBench | 42.7% | — |
| TAU-bench v2 | 70.5% | — |
| TerminalBench Hard | 28.8% | — |
Key Takeaways
Coder V2 Lite Instruct offers the best value at $0.00/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 38.2 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) reaches a 33.5 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Non-reasoning)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
Coder V2 Lite Instruct
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
