Model Comparison
Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)
vs. Coder V2 Lite Instruct
Comparing 2 AI models · 10 benchmarks · Anthropic, DeepSeek
Recommended Pick
An Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning) 8 metric wins Strongest on: Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence
Lowest Price
Coder V2 Lite Instruct
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)
47.4 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
Coder V2 Lite Instruct is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning).
Reasoning gap
Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning) leads Coder V2 Lite Instruct by 32.2 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning) wins 8 measurable categories, including Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence, GPQA.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)
Anthropic
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Coder V2 Lite Instruct
DeepSeek
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick An Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning) | De Coder V2 Lite Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $18.75/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $75.00/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $32.81/1M | — |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Anthropic | DeepSeek |
| Release Date | May 22, 2025 | Jun 17, 2024 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 35.8 tok/s | — |
| TTFT | 1882ms | — |
| Latency | 1882ms | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | — |
| Reasoning Score | 47.4 | 15.2 |
| Intelligence | 33.0 | 8.5 |
| Math | 36.3 | — |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 70.1% | 31.9% |
| MMLU Pro | 86.0% | 42.9% |
| HLE | 5.9% | 5.3% |
| LiveCodeBench | 54.2% | 15.8% |
| MATH 500 | 94.1% | — |
| AIME 2025 | 36.3% | — |
| AIME (Original) | 56.3% | — |
| SciCode | 40.9% | 13.9% |
| LCR | 36.0% | — |
| IFBench | 43.3% | — |
Key Takeaways
Coder V2 Lite Instruct offers the best value at $0.00/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 47.4 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
Coder V2 Lite Instruct
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
