Model Comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low Effort)
vs. MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Comparing 2 AI models · 7 benchmarks · Anthropic, Xiaomi
Recommended Pick
Xi MiMo-V2.5-Pro 14 metric wins Strongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
100.0 value score
58.1 reasoning / $0.54/1M
Lowest Price
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
$0.43/1M input price
Best Reasoning
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
58.1 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
45.5 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is 6.9x cheaper on input tokens than Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low Effort).
Speed gap
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low Effort) generates about 1.3x as many tokens per second as MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
Reasoning gap
MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low Effort) by 13.7 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low Effort) by 2.5 points on coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low Effort)
Anthropic
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Xiaomi
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | An Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low Effort) | Top Pick Xi MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $3.00/1M | $0.43/1M |
| Output Cost | $15.00/1M | $0.87/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $6.00/1M | $0.54/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Anthropic | Xiaomi |
| Release Date | Feb 17, 2026 | Apr 22, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 48.7 tok/s | 38.3 tok/s |
| TTFT | 1220ms | 2472ms |
| Latency | 1220ms | 54737ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 6.9 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 44.4 | 58.1 |
| Intelligence | 42.6 | 53.8 |
| Coding | 43.0 | 45.5 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 79.7% | 86.6% |
| HLE | 10.8% | 33.8% |
| SciCode | 44.1% | 50.2% |
| LCR | 58.7% | 73.3% |
| IFBench | 42.4% | 79.9% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 78.9% | 94.2% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 42.4% | 43.2% |
Key Takeaways
MiMo-V2.5-Pro offers the best value at $0.43/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the strongest reasoning profile with a 58.1 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro reaches a 45.5 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low Effort)
- General-purpose AI
- Versatile applications
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
