Model Comparison
DeepHermes 3 - Mistral 24B Preview (Non-reasoning)
vs. Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)
Comparing 2 AI models · 11 benchmarks · Nous Research, MoonshotAI
Recommended Pick
Mo Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning) 6 metric wins Strongest on: Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence
Lowest Price
DeepHermes 3 - Mistral 24B Preview (Non-reasoning)
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)
42.8 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)
25.8 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
DeepHermes 3 - Mistral 24B Preview (Non-reasoning) is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning).
Reasoning gap
Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning) leads DeepHermes 3 - Mistral 24B Preview (Non-reasoning) by 19.4 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning) wins 6 measurable categories, including Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence, GPQA.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
DeepHermes 3 - Mistral 24B Preview (Non-reasoning)
Nous Research
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)
MoonshotAI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | No DeepHermes 3 - Mistral 24B Preview (Non-reasoning) | Top Pick Mo Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.00/1M | $0.60/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.00/1M | $3.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | — | $1.20/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Nous Research | MoonshotAI |
| Release Date | Mar 13, 2025 | Jan 27, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | 41.3 tok/s |
| TTFT | — | 1251ms |
| Latency | — | 1251ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | — | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 23.4 | 42.8 |
| Intelligence | 10.9 | 37.3 |
| Coding | — | 25.8 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 38.2% | 78.9% |
| MMLU Pro | 58.0% | — |
| HLE | 3.9% | 12.3% |
| LiveCodeBench | 19.5% | — |
| MATH 500 | 59.5% | — |
| AIME (Original) | 4.7% | — |
| SciCode | 22.8% | 39.6% |
| LCR | — | 59.0% |
| IFBench | — | 43.7% |
| TAU-bench v2 | — | 81.3% |
| TerminalBench Hard | — | 18.9% |
Key Takeaways
DeepHermes 3 - Mistral 24B Preview (Non-reasoning) offers the best value at $0.00/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 42.8 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning) reaches a 25.8 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
DeepHermes 3 - Mistral 24B Preview (Non-reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
