Model Comparison
R1 Distill Qwen 14B
vs. o1-preview
Comparing 2 AI models · 10 benchmarks · DeepSeek, OpenAI
Recommended Pick
De R1 Distill Qwen 14B 3 metric wins Strongest on: Input price, Output price, MATH 500
Lowest Price
R1 Distill Qwen 14B
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
o1-preview
54.7 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
o1-preview
34.0 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
R1 Distill Qwen 14B is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than o1-preview.
Reasoning gap
o1-preview leads R1 Distill Qwen 14B by 6.8 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
R1 Distill Qwen 14B wins 3 measurable categories, including Input price, Output price, MATH 500.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
R1 Distill Qwen 14B
DeepSeek
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
o1-preview
OpenAI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick De R1 Distill Qwen 14B | Op o1-preview |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.00/1M | $16.50/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.00/1M | $66.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | — | $28.88/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | DeepSeek | OpenAI |
| Release Date | Jan 20, 2025 | Sep 12, 2024 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | — |
| TTFT | — | — |
| Latency | — | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | — | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 47.9 | 54.7 |
| Intelligence | 9.8 | 17.0 |
| Coding | — | 34.0 |
| Math | 55.7 | — |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 48.4% | — |
| MMLU Pro | 74.0% | — |
| HLE | 4.4% | — |
| LiveCodeBench | 37.6% | — |
| MATH 500 | 94.9% | 92.4% |
| AIME 2025 | 55.7% | — |
| AIME (Original) | 66.7% | — |
| SciCode | 23.9% | — |
| LCR | 7.0% | — |
| IFBench | 22.1% | — |
Key Takeaways
R1 Distill Qwen 14B offers the best value at $0.00/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
o1-preview has the strongest reasoning profile with a 54.7 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
o1-preview reaches a 34.0 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
R1 Distill Qwen 14B
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
o1-preview
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
Recommended Comparisons
Popular alternatives 
