Model Comparison
R1 Distill Qwen 14B
vs. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
Comparing 2 AI models · 12 benchmarks · DeepSeek, Alibaba
Recommended Pick
Al Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct 11 metric wins Strongest on: Throughput, Intelligence, Math
Lowest Price
R1 Distill Qwen 14B
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
R1 Distill Qwen 14B
48.8 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
14.3 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
R1 Distill Qwen 14B is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct.
Reasoning gap
R1 Distill Qwen 14B leads Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct by 1.5 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct wins 11 measurable categories, including Throughput, Intelligence, Math, GPQA.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
R1 Distill Qwen 14B
DeepSeek
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | De R1 Distill Qwen 14B | Top Pick Al Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.00/1M | $0.20/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.00/1M | $0.60/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | — | $0.30/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | DeepSeek | Alibaba |
| Release Date | Jan 20, 2025 | Oct 3, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | 125.1 tok/s |
| TTFT | — | 1099ms |
| Latency | — | 1099ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | — | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 48.8 | 47.3 |
| Intelligence | 15.8 | 16.0 |
| Coding | — | 14.3 |
| Math | 55.7 | 72.3 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 48.4% | 69.5% |
| MMLU Pro | 74.0% | 76.4% |
| HLE | 4.4% | 6.4% |
| LiveCodeBench | 37.6% | 47.6% |
| MATH 500 | 94.9% | — |
| AIME 2025 | 55.7% | 72.3% |
| AIME (Original) | 66.7% | — |
| SciCode | 23.9% | 30.8% |
| LCR | 7.0% | 23.7% |
| IFBench | 22.1% | 33.1% |
| TAU-bench v2 | — | 19.0% |
| TerminalBench Hard | — | 6.1% |
Key Takeaways
R1 Distill Qwen 14B offers the best value at $0.00/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
R1 Distill Qwen 14B has the strongest reasoning profile with a 48.8 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct reaches a 14.3 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
R1 Distill Qwen 14B
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
- Code generation
- Software development
Recommended Comparisons
Popular alternatives 
