Model Comparison
R1 0528 Qwen3 8B
vs. Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high)
Comparing 2 AI models · 12 benchmarks · DeepSeek, Google
Recommended Pick
Go Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high) 14 metric wins Strongest on: Reasoning, Intelligence, Coding
Lowest Price
R1 0528 Qwen3 8B
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high)
71.8 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high)
46.5 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
R1 0528 Qwen3 8B is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high).
Reasoning gap
Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high) leads R1 0528 Qwen3 8B by 20.0 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high) leads R1 0528 Qwen3 8B by 38.7 points on coding.
Top-pick rationale
Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high) wins 14 measurable categories, including Reasoning, Intelligence, Coding, Math.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
R1 0528 Qwen3 8B
DeepSeek
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high)
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | De R1 0528 Qwen3 8B | Top Pick Go Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.00/1M | $2.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.00/1M | $12.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | — | $4.50/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | DeepSeek | |
| Release Date | May 29, 2025 | Nov 18, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | — |
| TTFT | — | — |
| Latency | — | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | — | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 51.8 | 71.8 |
| Intelligence | 10.4 | 39.6 |
| Coding | 7.8 | 46.5 |
| Math | 63.7 | 95.7 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 61.2% | 90.8% |
| MMLU Pro | 73.9% | 89.8% |
| HLE | 5.6% | 37.2% |
| LiveCodeBench | 51.3% | 91.7% |
| MATH 500 | 93.2% | — |
| AIME 2025 | 63.7% | 95.7% |
| AIME (Original) | 65.0% | — |
| SciCode | 20.4% | 56.1% |
| LCR | 13.0% | 70.7% |
| IFBench | 19.9% | 70.4% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 0.0% | 87.1% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 1.5% | 41.7% |
Key Takeaways
R1 0528 Qwen3 8B offers the best value at $0.00/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 71.8 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high) reaches a 46.5 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
R1 0528 Qwen3 8B
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
