Model Comparison
R1 0528 Qwen3 8B
vs. Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning)
Comparing 2 AI models · 12 benchmarks · DeepSeek, Alibaba
Recommended Pick
Al Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning) 9 metric wins Strongest on: Throughput, Intelligence, GPQA
Lowest Price
R1 0528 Qwen3 8B
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
R1 0528 Qwen3 8B
51.8 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
R1 0528 Qwen3 8B is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning).
Reasoning gap
R1 0528 Qwen3 8B leads Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning) by 9.9 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning) wins 9 measurable categories, including Throughput, Intelligence, GPQA, HLE.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
R1 0528 Qwen3 8B
DeepSeek
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | De R1 0528 Qwen3 8B | Top Pick Al Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.00/1M | $0.60/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.00/1M | $3.60/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | — | $1.35/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | DeepSeek | Alibaba |
| Release Date | May 29, 2025 | Apr 22, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | 64.1 tok/s |
| TTFT | — | 1333ms |
| Latency | — | 1333ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | — | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 51.8 | 41.9 |
| Intelligence | 10.4 | 29.3 |
| Math | 63.7 | — |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 61.2% | 82.9% |
| MMLU Pro | 73.9% | — |
| HLE | 5.6% | 13.6% |
| LiveCodeBench | 51.3% | — |
| MATH 500 | 93.2% | — |
| AIME 2025 | 63.7% | — |
| AIME (Original) | 65.0% | — |
| SciCode | 20.4% | 37.3% |
| LCR | 13.0% | 55.0% |
| IFBench | 19.9% | 45.7% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 0.0% | 93.6% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 1.5% | 21.2% |
Key Takeaways
R1 0528 Qwen3 8B offers the best value at $0.00/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
R1 0528 Qwen3 8B has the strongest reasoning profile with a 51.8 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
R1 0528 Qwen3 8B
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning)
- General-purpose AI
- Versatile applications
