Model Comparison
V3 (Dec '24)
vs. MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
Comparing 2 AI models · 12 benchmarks · DeepSeek, Xiaomi
Recommended Pick
Xi MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) 15 metric wins Strongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
100.0 value score
48.3 reasoning / $0.15/1M
Lowest Price
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
$0.10/1M input price
Best Reasoning
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
48.3 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
33.5 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) is 4.0x cheaper on input tokens than V3 (Dec '24).
Reasoning gap
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) leads V3 (Dec '24) by 13.8 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) leads V3 (Dec '24) by 17.1 points on coding.
Top-pick rationale
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) wins 15 measurable categories, including Value, Input price, Output price, Blended price.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
V3 (Dec '24)
DeepSeek
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
Xiaomi
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | De V3 (Dec '24) | Top Pick Xi MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.40/1M | $0.10/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.89/1M | $0.30/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.52/1M | $0.15/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | DeepSeek | Xiaomi |
| Release Date | Dec 26, 2024 | Dec 16, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | 125.7 tok/s |
| TTFT | — | 1364ms |
| Latency | — | 17269ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 20.5 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 34.5 | 48.3 |
| Intelligence | 16.5 | 41.5 |
| Coding | 16.4 | 33.5 |
| Math | 26.0 | — |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 55.7% | 83.5% |
| MMLU Pro | 75.2% | — |
| HLE | 3.6% | 20.0% |
| LiveCodeBench | 35.9% | — |
| MATH 500 | 88.7% | — |
| AIME 2025 | 26.0% | — |
| AIME (Original) | 25.3% | — |
| SciCode | 35.4% | 38.3% |
| LCR | 29.0% | 64.3% |
| IFBench | 34.8% | 71.8% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 22.8% | 93.3% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 6.8% | 31.1% |
Key Takeaways
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) offers the best value at $0.10/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 48.3 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) reaches a 33.5 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
V3 (Dec '24)
- General-purpose AI
- Versatile applications
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
