Model Comparison
V3.2 Exp (Non-reasoning)
vs. MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning)
Comparing 2 AI models · 10 benchmarks · DeepSeek, Xiaomi
Recommended Pick
De V3.2 Exp (Non-reasoning) 10 metric wins Strongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
V3.2 Exp (Non-reasoning)
100.0 value score
45.2 reasoning / $0.31/1M
Lowest Price
V3.2 Exp (Non-reasoning)
$0.28/1M input price
Best Reasoning
V3.2 Exp (Non-reasoning)
45.2 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning)
36.8 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
V3.2 Exp (Non-reasoning) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
V3.2 Exp (Non-reasoning) is 3.3x cheaper on input tokens than MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning).
Reasoning gap
V3.2 Exp (Non-reasoning) leads MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning) by 3.5 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning) leads V3.2 Exp (Non-reasoning) by 6.8 points on coding.
Top-pick rationale
V3.2 Exp (Non-reasoning) wins 10 measurable categories, including Value, Input price, Output price, Blended price.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
V3.2 Exp (Non-reasoning)
DeepSeek
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning)
Xiaomi
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick De V3.2 Exp (Non-reasoning) | Xi MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.28/1M | $0.90/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.41/1M | $2.70/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.31/1M | $1.35/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | DeepSeek | Xiaomi |
| Release Date | Sep 29, 2025 | Apr 22, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | 45.6 tok/s |
| TTFT | — | 2882ms |
| Latency | — | 2882ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 21.2 |
| Reasoning Score | 45.2 | 41.7 |
| Intelligence | 28.4 | 35.6 |
| Coding | 30.0 | 36.8 |
| Math | 57.7 | — |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 73.8% | 76.2% |
| MMLU Pro | 83.6% | — |
| HLE | 8.6% | 13.3% |
| LiveCodeBench | 55.4% | — |
| AIME 2025 | 57.7% | — |
| SciCode | 39.9% | 39.1% |
| LCR | 43.0% | 35.0% |
| IFBench | 43.1% | 42.7% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 33.9% | 72.5% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 25.0% | 35.6% |
Key Takeaways
V3.2 Exp (Non-reasoning) offers the best value at $0.28/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
V3.2 Exp (Non-reasoning) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 45.2 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning) reaches a 36.8 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
V3.2 Exp (Non-reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning)
- Code generation
- Software development
