Model Comparison
V3.2 Speciale
vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Comparing 2 AI models · 10 benchmarks · DeepSeek, Google
Recommended Pick
Go Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 10 metric wins Strongest on: Throughput, Intelligence, Coding
Lowest Price
V3.2 Speciale
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
V3.2 Speciale
67.2 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
55.5 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
V3.2 Speciale is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview.
Reasoning gap
V3.2 Speciale leads Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview by 1.9 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads V3.2 Speciale by 17.6 points on coding.
Top-pick rationale
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview wins 10 measurable categories, including Throughput, Intelligence, Coding, GPQA.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
V3.2 Speciale
DeepSeek
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | De V3.2 Speciale | Top Pick Go Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.00/1M | $2.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.00/1M | $12.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | — | $4.50/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | DeepSeek | |
| Release Date | Dec 1, 2025 | Feb 19, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | 131.4 tok/s |
| TTFT | — | 26995ms |
| Latency | — | 26995ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | — | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 67.2 | 65.3 |
| Intelligence | 29.4 | 57.2 |
| Coding | 37.9 | 55.5 |
| Math | 96.7 | — |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 87.1% | 94.1% |
| MMLU Pro | 86.3% | — |
| HLE | 26.1% | 44.7% |
| LiveCodeBench | 89.6% | — |
| AIME 2025 | 96.7% | — |
| SciCode | 44.0% | 58.9% |
| LCR | 59.3% | 72.7% |
| IFBench | 63.9% | 77.1% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 0.0% | 95.6% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 34.8% | 53.8% |
Key Takeaways
V3.2 Speciale offers the best value at $0.00/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
V3.2 Speciale has the strongest reasoning profile with a 67.2 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview reaches a 55.5 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
V3.2 Speciale
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
- Code generation
- Software development
