Model Comparison
V4 Pro (Reasoning, High Effort)
vs. MiMo-V2-Pro
Comparing 2 AI models · 7 benchmarks · DeepSeek, Xiaomi
Recommended Pick
De V4 Pro (Reasoning, High Effort) 15 metric wins Strongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
V4 Pro (Reasoning, High Effort)
100.0 value score
54.9 reasoning / $0.54/1M
Lowest Price
V4 Pro (Reasoning, High Effort)
$0.43/1M input price
Best Reasoning
V4 Pro (Reasoning, High Effort)
54.9 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
V4 Pro (Reasoning, High Effort) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
V4 Pro (Reasoning, High Effort) is 2.3x cheaper on input tokens than MiMo-V2-Pro.
Speed gap
V4 Pro (Reasoning, High Effort) generates about 1.7x as many tokens per second as MiMo-V2-Pro.
Reasoning gap
V4 Pro (Reasoning, High Effort) leads MiMo-V2-Pro by 3.1 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
V4 Pro (Reasoning, High Effort) wins 15 measurable categories, including Value, Input price, Output price, Blended price.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
V4 Pro (Reasoning, High Effort)
DeepSeek
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
MiMo-V2-Pro
Xiaomi
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick De V4 Pro (Reasoning, High Effort) | Xi MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.43/1M | $1.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.87/1M | $3.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.54/1M | $1.50/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | DeepSeek | Xiaomi |
| Release Date | Apr 24, 2026 | Mar 18, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 89.8 tok/s | 52.9 tok/s |
| TTFT | 1145ms | 1581ms |
| Latency | 23329ms | 56880ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 34.2 |
| Reasoning Score | 54.9 | 51.9 |
| Intelligence | 40.8 | 40.3 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 90.5% | 87.0% |
| HLE | 33.5% | 28.3% |
| SciCode | 46.4% | 42.5% |
| LCR | 65.0% | 60.7% |
| IFBench | 71.3% | 68.8% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 94.2% | 95.0% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 41.7% | 40.9% |
Key Takeaways
V4 Pro (Reasoning, High Effort) offers the best value at $0.43/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
V4 Pro (Reasoning, High Effort) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 54.9 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
V4 Pro (Reasoning, High Effort)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
MiMo-V2-Pro
- General-purpose AI
- Versatile applications
