Model Comparison
V4 Pro (Non-reasoning)
vs. GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning)
Comparing 2 AI models · 7 benchmarks · DeepSeek, Z AI
Recommended Pick
De V4 Pro (Non-reasoning) 9 metric wins Strongest on: Latency, Reasoning, Intelligence
Best Value
GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning)
100.0 value score
31.8 reasoning / $0.15/1M
Lowest Price
GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning)
$0.07/1M input price
Best Reasoning
V4 Pro (Non-reasoning)
39.6 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
V4 Pro (Non-reasoning)
38.4 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning) is 6.2x cheaper on input tokens than V4 Pro (Non-reasoning).
Speed gap
GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning) generates about 1.5x as many tokens per second as V4 Pro (Non-reasoning).
Reasoning gap
V4 Pro (Non-reasoning) leads GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning) by 7.8 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
V4 Pro (Non-reasoning) leads GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning) by 12.5 points on coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
V4 Pro (Non-reasoning)
DeepSeek
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning)
Z AI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick De V4 Pro (Non-reasoning) | Z GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.43/1M | $0.07/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.87/1M | $0.40/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.54/1M | $0.15/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | DeepSeek | Z AI |
| Release Date | Apr 24, 2026 | Jan 19, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 49.3 tok/s | 75.9 tok/s |
| TTFT | 1158ms | 988ms |
| Latency | 1158ms | 27336ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 34.9 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 39.6 | 31.8 |
| Intelligence | 39.3 | 30.1 |
| Coding | 38.4 | 25.9 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 71.7% | 58.1% |
| HLE | 7.7% | 7.1% |
| SciCode | 42.4% | 33.7% |
| LCR | 45.0% | 35.0% |
| IFBench | 45.8% | 60.8% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 91.2% | 98.8% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 36.4% | 22.0% |
Key Takeaways
GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning) offers the best value at $0.07/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
V4 Pro (Non-reasoning) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 39.6 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
V4 Pro (Non-reasoning) reaches a 38.4 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
V4 Pro (Non-reasoning)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Recommended Comparisons
Popular alternatives
