Model Comparison
V4 Pro (Non-reasoning)
vs. GLM-5 (Non-reasoning)
Comparing 2 AI models · 7 benchmarks · DeepSeek, Z AI
Recommended Pick
De V4 Pro (Non-reasoning) 12 metric wins Strongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
V4 Pro (Non-reasoning)
100.0 value score
36.9 reasoning / $0.54/1M
Lowest Price
V4 Pro (Non-reasoning)
$0.43/1M input price
Best Reasoning
V4 Pro (Non-reasoning)
36.9 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
GLM-5 (Non-reasoning)
39.0 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
V4 Pro (Non-reasoning) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
V4 Pro (Non-reasoning) is 2.3x cheaper on input tokens than GLM-5 (Non-reasoning).
Speed gap
V4 Pro (Non-reasoning) generates about 1.2x as many tokens per second as GLM-5 (Non-reasoning).
Reasoning gap
V4 Pro (Non-reasoning) leads GLM-5 (Non-reasoning) by 1.5 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
GLM-5 (Non-reasoning) leads V4 Pro (Non-reasoning) by 0.6 points on coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
V4 Pro (Non-reasoning)
DeepSeek
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
GLM-5 (Non-reasoning)
Z AI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick De V4 Pro (Non-reasoning) | Z GLM-5 (Non-reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.43/1M | $1.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.87/1M | $3.20/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.54/1M | $1.55/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | DeepSeek | Z AI |
| Release Date | Apr 24, 2026 | Feb 11, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 76.9 tok/s | 63.9 tok/s |
| TTFT | 1125ms | 1240ms |
| Latency | 1125ms | 1240ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 33.7 |
| Reasoning Score | 36.9 | 35.4 |
| Intelligence | 31.2 | 32.4 |
| Coding | 38.4 | 39.0 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 71.7% | 66.6% |
| HLE | 7.7% | 7.2% |
| SciCode | 42.4% | 38.3% |
| LCR | 45.0% | 37.0% |
| IFBench | 45.8% | 55.2% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 91.2% | 97.4% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 36.4% | 39.4% |
Key Takeaways
V4 Pro (Non-reasoning) offers the best value at $0.43/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
V4 Pro (Non-reasoning) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 36.9 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
GLM-5 (Non-reasoning) reaches a 39.0 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
V4 Pro (Non-reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
GLM-5 (Non-reasoning)
- Code generation
- Software development
