Model Comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental (Jan '25)
vs. GPT-5.4 (low)
Comparing 2 AI models · 11 benchmarks · Google, OpenAI
Recommended Pick
Op GPT-5.4 (low) 7 metric wins Strongest on: Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence
Lowest Price
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental (Jan '25)
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
GPT-5.4 (low)
54.6 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
GPT-5.4 (low)
45.6 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental (Jan '25) is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than GPT-5.4 (low).
Reasoning gap
GPT-5.4 (low) leads Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental (Jan '25) by 6.4 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
GPT-5.4 (low) leads Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental (Jan '25) by 21.5 points on coding.
Top-pick rationale
GPT-5.4 (low) wins 7 measurable categories, including Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence, Coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental (Jan '25)
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
GPT-5.4 (low)
OpenAI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Go Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental (Jan '25) | Top Pick Op GPT-5.4 (low) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.00/1M | $2.63/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.00/1M | $15.75/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | — | $5.91/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | OpenAI | |
| Release Date | Jan 21, 2025 | Mar 5, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | 118.0 tok/s |
| TTFT | — | 1431ms |
| Latency | — | 1431ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | — | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 48.2 | 54.6 |
| Intelligence | 19.6 | 47.9 |
| Coding | 24.1 | 45.6 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 70.1% | 87.1% |
| MMLU Pro | 79.8% | — |
| HLE | 7.1% | 28.9% |
| LiveCodeBench | 32.1% | — |
| MATH 500 | 94.4% | — |
| AIME (Original) | 50.0% | — |
| SciCode | 32.9% | 50.3% |
| LCR | — | 67.3% |
| IFBench | — | 65.9% |
| TAU-bench v2 | — | 74.6% |
| TerminalBench Hard | — | 43.2% |
Key Takeaways
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental (Jan '25) offers the best value at $0.00/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
GPT-5.4 (low) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 54.6 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
GPT-5.4 (low) reaches a 45.6 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental (Jan '25)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
GPT-5.4 (low)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
