Model Comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Non-reasoning)
vs. Qwen3.5 Omni Plus
Comparing 2 AI models · 12 benchmarks · Google, Alibaba
Recommended Pick
Al Qwen3.5 Omni Plus 10 metric wins Strongest on: Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence
Best Value
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Non-reasoning)
100.0 value score
38.7 reasoning / $0.18/1M
Lowest Price
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Non-reasoning)
$0.10/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Qwen3.5 Omni Plus
42.4 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Non-reasoning) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Non-reasoning) is 4.0x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3.5 Omni Plus.
Reasoning gap
Qwen3.5 Omni Plus leads Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Non-reasoning) by 3.6 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Qwen3.5 Omni Plus wins 10 measurable categories, including Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence, GPQA.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Non-reasoning)
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Qwen3.5 Omni Plus
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Go Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Non-reasoning) | Top Pick Al Qwen3.5 Omni Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.10/1M | $0.40/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.40/1M | $4.80/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.18/1M | $1.50/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | |
| Release Date | Jun 17, 2025 | Mar 30, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | 50.5 tok/s |
| TTFT | — | 1237ms |
| Latency | — | 1237ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 12.8 |
| Reasoning Score | 38.7 | 42.4 |
| Intelligence | 6.9 | 30.6 |
| Math | 35.3 | — |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 47.4% | 82.6% |
| MMLU Pro | 72.4% | — |
| HLE | 3.7% | 13.9% |
| LiveCodeBench | 40.0% | — |
| MATH 500 | 92.6% | — |
| AIME 2025 | 35.3% | — |
| AIME (Original) | 50.0% | — |
| SciCode | 17.7% | 40.5% |
| LCR | 31.3% | 52.7% |
| IFBench | 31.5% | 51.2% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 19.0% | 88.3% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 2.3% | 21.2% |
Key Takeaways
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Non-reasoning) offers the best value at $0.10/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Qwen3.5 Omni Plus has the strongest reasoning profile with a 42.4 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Non-reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Qwen3.5 Omni Plus
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
