Model Comparison
Gemini 3.5 Flash (high)
vs. M1 40k
Comparing 2 AI models · 12 benchmarks · Google, MiniMax
Recommended Pick
Go Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) 10 metric wins Strongest on: Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence
Lowest Price
M1 40k
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Gemini 3.5 Flash (high)
61.1 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Gemini 3.5 Flash (high)
70.1 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
M1 40k is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than Gemini 3.5 Flash (high).
Reasoning gap
Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) leads M1 40k by 18.8 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) wins 10 measurable categories, including Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence, GPQA.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Gemini 3.5 Flash (high)
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
M1 40k
MiniMax
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Go Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) | Mi M1 40k |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $1.50/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $9.00/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $3.38/1M | — |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | MiniMax | |
| Release Date | May 19, 2026 | Jun 17, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 221.3 tok/s | — |
| TTFT | 18103ms | — |
| Latency | 18103ms | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | — |
| Reasoning Score | 61.1 | 42.3 |
| Intelligence | 50.2 | 14.4 |
| Coding | 70.1 | — |
| Math | — | 13.7 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 92.2% | 68.2% |
| MMLU Pro | — | 80.8% |
| HLE | 41.0% | 7.5% |
| LiveCodeBench | — | 65.7% |
| MATH 500 | — | 97.2% |
| AIME 2025 | — | 13.7% |
| AIME (Original) | — | 81.3% |
| SciCode | 53.1% | 37.8% |
| LCR | 69.3% | 51.7% |
| IFBench | 76.3% | 41.2% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 95.3% | 31.6% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 40.9% | 2.3% |
Key Takeaways
M1 40k offers the best value at $0.00/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 61.1 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) reaches a 70.1 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Gemini 3.5 Flash (high)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
M1 40k
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
