Model Comparison
Gemma 3n E4B Instruct Preview (May '25)
vs. Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
Comparing 2 AI models · 11 benchmarks · Google, NVIDIA
Recommended Pick
NV Nemotron 3 Nano 4B 3 metric wins Strongest on: Intelligence, GPQA, SciCode
Lowest Price
Gemma 3n E4B Instruct Preview (May '25)
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Gemma 3n E4B Instruct Preview (May '25)
25.7 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
10.0 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Reasoning gap
Gemma 3n E4B Instruct Preview (May '25) leads Nemotron 3 Nano 4B by 2.1 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Nemotron 3 Nano 4B wins 3 measurable categories, including Intelligence, GPQA, SciCode.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Gemma 3n E4B Instruct Preview (May '25)
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
NVIDIA
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Go Gemma 3n E4B Instruct Preview (May '25) | Top Pick NV Nemotron 3 Nano 4B |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.00/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.00/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | NVIDIA | |
| Release Date | May 20, 2025 | Mar 16, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | — |
| TTFT | — | — |
| Latency | — | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Reasoning Score | 25.7 | 23.6 |
| Intelligence | 10.1 | 14.7 |
| Coding | — | 10.0 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 27.8% | 51.3% |
| MMLU Pro | 48.3% | — |
| HLE | 4.9% | 4.8% |
| LiveCodeBench | 13.8% | — |
| MATH 500 | 74.9% | — |
| AIME (Original) | 10.7% | — |
| SciCode | 8.6% | 16.4% |
| LCR | — | 16.7% |
| IFBench | — | 58.2% |
| TAU-bench v2 | — | 28.1% |
| TerminalBench Hard | — | 6.8% |
Key Takeaways
Gemma 3n E4B Instruct Preview (May '25) offers the best value at $0.00/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Gemma 3n E4B Instruct Preview (May '25) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 25.7 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Nemotron 3 Nano 4B reaches a 10.0 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Gemma 3n E4B Instruct Preview (May '25)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Code generation
- Software development
