Model Comparison
Gemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning)
vs. Olmo 3 32B Think
Comparing 2 AI models · 10 benchmarks · Google, Allen Institute for AI
Recommended Pick
Go Gemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning) 9 metric wins Strongest on: Throughput, Intelligence, GPQA
Lowest Price
Olmo 3 32B Think
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Olmo 3 32B Think
44.1 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
Olmo 3 32B Think is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than Gemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning).
Reasoning gap
Olmo 3 32B Think leads Gemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning) by 6.6 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Gemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning) wins 9 measurable categories, including Throughput, Intelligence, GPQA, HLE.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Gemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning)
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Olmo 3 32B Think
Allen Institute for AI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Go Gemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning) | Al Olmo 3 32B Think |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.14/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.40/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.21/1M | — |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Allen Institute for AI | |
| Release Date | Apr 2, 2026 | Nov 20, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 51.5 tok/s | — |
| TTFT | 1126ms | — |
| Latency | 1126ms | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | — |
| Reasoning Score | 37.5 | 44.1 |
| Intelligence | 24.8 | 6.4 |
| Math | — | 73.7 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 76.3% | 61.0% |
| MMLU Pro | — | 75.9% |
| HLE | 11.5% | 5.9% |
| LiveCodeBench | — | 67.2% |
| AIME 2025 | — | 73.7% |
| SciCode | 41.1% | 28.6% |
| LCR | 36.0% | 0.0% |
| IFBench | 53.5% | 49.1% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 65.5% | 0.0% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 30.3% | 1.5% |
Key Takeaways
Olmo 3 32B Think offers the best value at $0.00/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Olmo 3 32B Think has the strongest reasoning profile with a 44.1 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Gemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning)
- General-purpose AI
- Versatile applications
Olmo 3 32B Think
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
