Model Comparison
Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)
vs. Ministral 3 14B
Comparing 2 AI models · 10 benchmarks · Google, Mistral
Recommended Pick
Go Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) 11 metric wins Strongest on: Input price, Output price, TTFT
Lowest Price
Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Ministral 3 14B
27.6 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)
13.7 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than Ministral 3 14B.
Reasoning gap
Ministral 3 14B leads Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) by 0.9 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) leads Ministral 3 14B by 2.8 points on coding.
Top-pick rationale
Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) wins 11 measurable categories, including Input price, Output price, TTFT, Latency.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Ministral 3 14B
Mistral
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Go Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) | Mi Ministral 3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.00/1M | $0.20/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.00/1M | $0.20/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | — | $0.20/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Mistral | |
| Release Date | Apr 3, 2026 | Dec 2, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | 85.7 tok/s |
| TTFT | — | 368ms |
| Latency | — | 368ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | — | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 26.7 | 27.6 |
| Intelligence | 18.8 | 16.0 |
| Coding | 13.7 | 10.9 |
| Math | — | 30.0 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 57.6% | 57.2% |
| MMLU Pro | — | 69.3% |
| HLE | 3.7% | 4.6% |
| LiveCodeBench | — | 35.1% |
| AIME 2025 | — | 30.0% |
| SciCode | 24.4% | 23.6% |
| LCR | 30.7% | 22.0% |
| IFBench | 44.2% | 32.0% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 20.8% | 27.2% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 8.3% | 4.5% |
Key Takeaways
Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) offers the best value at $0.00/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Ministral 3 14B has the strongest reasoning profile with a 27.6 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) reaches a 13.7 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Code generation
- Software development
Ministral 3 14B
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
