Model Comparison
Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning)
vs. Kimi K2.6 (Non-reasoning)
Comparing 2 AI models · 7 benchmarks · Google, MoonshotAI
Recommended Pick
Mo Kimi K2.6 (Non-reasoning) 11 metric wins Strongest on: Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence
Lowest Price
Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning)
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Kimi K2.6 (Non-reasoning)
46.6 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Kimi K2.6 (Non-reasoning)
38.4 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning) is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than Kimi K2.6 (Non-reasoning).
Reasoning gap
Kimi K2.6 (Non-reasoning) leads Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning) by 21.8 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
Kimi K2.6 (Non-reasoning) leads Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning) by 32.0 points on coding.
Top-pick rationale
Kimi K2.6 (Non-reasoning) wins 11 measurable categories, including Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence, Coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning)
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Kimi K2.6 (Non-reasoning)
MoonshotAI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Go Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning) | Top Pick Mo Kimi K2.6 (Non-reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.00/1M | $0.95/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.00/1M | $4.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | — | $1.71/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | MoonshotAI | |
| Release Date | Apr 3, 2026 | Apr 20, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | 28.8 tok/s |
| TTFT | — | 1414ms |
| Latency | — | 1414ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | — | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 24.8 | 46.6 |
| Intelligence | 14.8 | 42.9 |
| Coding | 6.4 | 38.4 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 54.9% | 78.8% |
| HLE | 4.7% | 18.2% |
| SciCode | 3.9% | 39.5% |
| LCR | 18.0% | 57.7% |
| IFBench | 40.5% | 44.3% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 26.0% | 93.9% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 7.6% | 37.9% |
Key Takeaways
Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning) offers the best value at $0.00/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Kimi K2.6 (Non-reasoning) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 46.6 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Kimi K2.6 (Non-reasoning) reaches a 38.4 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Kimi K2.6 (Non-reasoning)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
