Model Comparison
GLM 5V Turbo (Reasoning)
vs. Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning)
Comparing 2 AI models · 7 benchmarks · Z AI, Alibaba
Recommended Pick
Al Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) 9 metric wins Strongest on: Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence
Lowest Price
GLM 5V Turbo (Reasoning)
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning)
53.9 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning)
41.3 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
GLM 5V Turbo (Reasoning) is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning).
Reasoning gap
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) leads GLM 5V Turbo (Reasoning) by 7.3 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) leads GLM 5V Turbo (Reasoning) by 5.1 points on coding.
Top-pick rationale
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) wins 9 measurable categories, including Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence, Coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
GLM 5V Turbo (Reasoning)
Z AI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Z GLM 5V Turbo (Reasoning) | Top Pick Al Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.00/1M | $0.60/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.00/1M | $3.60/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | — | $1.35/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Z AI | Alibaba |
| Release Date | Apr 1, 2026 | Feb 16, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | 51.8 tok/s |
| TTFT | — | 1915ms |
| Latency | — | 63463ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | — | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 46.5 | 53.9 |
| Intelligence | 42.9 | 45.0 |
| Coding | 36.2 | 41.3 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 80.9% | 89.3% |
| HLE | 15.8% | 27.3% |
| SciCode | 43.5% | 42.0% |
| LCR | 61.0% | 65.7% |
| IFBench | 61.1% | 78.8% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 98.5% | 95.6% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 32.6% | 40.9% |
Key Takeaways
GLM 5V Turbo (Reasoning) offers the best value at $0.00/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 53.9 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) reaches a 41.3 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
GLM 5V Turbo (Reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
