Model Comparison
GPT-4 Turbo
vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Comparing 2 AI models · 11 benchmarks · OpenAI, Google
Recommended Pick
Go Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 10 metric wins Strongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
100.0 value score
65.3 reasoning / $4.50/1M
Lowest Price
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
$2.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
65.3 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
55.5 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is 5.0x cheaper on input tokens than GPT-4 Turbo.
Speed gap
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview generates about 4.7x as many tokens per second as GPT-4 Turbo.
Reasoning gap
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads GPT-4 Turbo by 38.9 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads GPT-4 Turbo by 34.0 points on coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
GPT-4 Turbo
OpenAI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Op GPT-4 Turbo | Top Pick Go Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $10.00/1M | $2.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $30.00/1M | $12.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $15.00/1M | $4.50/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | OpenAI | |
| Release Date | Nov 6, 2023 | Feb 19, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 27.9 tok/s | 132.2 tok/s |
| TTFT | 1617ms | 24249ms |
| Latency | 1617ms | 24249ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 12.1 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 26.4 | 65.3 |
| Intelligence | 13.7 | 57.2 |
| Coding | 21.5 | 55.5 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | — | 94.1% |
| MMLU Pro | 69.4% | — |
| HLE | 3.3% | 44.7% |
| LiveCodeBench | 29.1% | — |
| MATH 500 | 73.7% | — |
| AIME (Original) | 15.0% | — |
| SciCode | 31.9% | 58.9% |
| LCR | — | 72.7% |
| IFBench | — | 77.1% |
| TAU-bench v2 | — | 95.6% |
| TerminalBench Hard | — | 53.8% |
Key Takeaways
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview offers the best value at $2.00/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has the strongest reasoning profile with a 65.3 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview reaches a 55.5 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
GPT-4 Turbo
- General-purpose AI
- Versatile applications
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
