Model Comparison
GPT-5.1 (high)
vs. Qwen3.7 Max
Comparing 2 AI models · 10 benchmarks · OpenAI, Alibaba
Recommended Pick
Al Qwen3.7 Max 12 metric wins Strongest on: Output price, Throughput, TTFT
Best Value
GPT-5.1 (high)
100.0 value score
69.9 reasoning / $3.44/1M
Lowest Price
GPT-5.1 (high)
$1.25/1M input price
Best Reasoning
GPT-5.1 (high)
69.9 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Qwen3.7 Max
50.1 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
GPT-5.1 (high) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
GPT-5.1 (high) is 2.0x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3.7 Max.
Speed gap
Qwen3.7 Max generates about 1.5x as many tokens per second as GPT-5.1 (high).
Reasoning gap
GPT-5.1 (high) leads Qwen3.7 Max by 7.6 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
Qwen3.7 Max leads GPT-5.1 (high) by 5.4 points on coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
GPT-5.1 (high)
OpenAI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Qwen3.7 Max
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Op GPT-5.1 (high) | Top Pick Al Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $1.25/1M | $2.50/1M |
| Output Cost | $10.00/1M | $7.50/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $3.44/1M | $3.75/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | OpenAI | Alibaba |
| Release Date | Nov 13, 2025 | May 19, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 124.9 tok/s | 188.8 tok/s |
| TTFT | 19477ms | 1730ms |
| Latency | 19477ms | 14492ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 81.7 |
| Reasoning Score | 69.9 | 62.3 |
| Intelligence | 47.7 | 56.6 |
| Coding | 44.7 | 50.1 |
| Math | 94.0 | — |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 87.3% | 92.3% |
| MMLU Pro | 87.0% | — |
| HLE | 26.5% | 38.1% |
| LiveCodeBench | 86.8% | — |
| AIME 2025 | 94.0% | — |
| SciCode | 43.3% | 48.8% |
| LCR | 75.0% | 69.0% |
| IFBench | 72.9% | 80.5% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 81.9% | 94.7% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 45.5% | 50.8% |
Key Takeaways
GPT-5.1 (high) offers the best value at $1.25/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
GPT-5.1 (high) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 69.9 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Qwen3.7 Max reaches a 50.1 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
GPT-5.1 (high)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
Qwen3.7 Max
- Code generation
- Software development
