Model Comparison
GPT-5 nano (high)
vs. MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B
Comparing 2 AI models · 10 benchmarks · OpenAI, OpenBMB
Recommended Pick
Op GPT-5 nano (high) 10 metric wins Strongest on: Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence
Lowest Price
MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
GPT-5 nano (high)
54.0 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
GPT-5 nano (high)
20.3 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than GPT-5 nano (high).
Reasoning gap
GPT-5 nano (high) leads MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B by 38.0 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
GPT-5 nano (high) leads MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B by 19.6 points on coding.
Top-pick rationale
GPT-5 nano (high) wins 10 measurable categories, including Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence, Coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
GPT-5 nano (high)
OpenAI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B
OpenBMB
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Op GPT-5 nano (high) | Op MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.05/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.40/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.14/1M | — |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | OpenAI | OpenBMB |
| Release Date | Aug 7, 2025 | May 11, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 152.6 tok/s | — |
| TTFT | 107328ms | — |
| Latency | 107328ms | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | — |
| Reasoning Score | 54.0 | 16.0 |
| Intelligence | 26.8 | 12.7 |
| Coding | 20.3 | 0.7 |
| Math | 83.7 | — |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 67.6% | 30.5% |
| MMLU Pro | 78.0% | — |
| HLE | 8.2% | 4.9% |
| LiveCodeBench | 78.9% | — |
| AIME 2025 | 83.7% | — |
| SciCode | 36.6% | 2.1% |
| LCR | 41.7% | 6.3% |
| IFBench | 67.6% | 26.7% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 36.5% | 87.7% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 12.1% | 0.0% |
Key Takeaways
MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B offers the best value at $0.00/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
GPT-5 nano (high) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 54.0 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
GPT-5 nano (high) reaches a 20.3 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
GPT-5 nano (high)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
