Model Comparison
Grok 3
vs. Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
Comparing 2 AI models · 12 benchmarks · SpaceXAI, Alibaba
Recommended Pick
SpGrok 311 metric winsStrongest on: TTFT, Latency, Reasoning
Best Value
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
100.0 value score
44.2 reasoning / $1.22/1M
Lowest Price
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
$0.70/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Grok 3
47.0 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is 5.7x cheaper on input tokens than Grok 3.
Reasoning gap
Grok 3 leads Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct by 2.7 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Grok 3 wins 11 measurable categories, including TTFT, Latency, Reasoning, Intelligence.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Grok 3
SpaceXAI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Sp Grok 3 | Al Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $4.00/1M | $0.70/1M |
| Output Cost | $20.00/1M | $2.80/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $8.00/1M | $1.22/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | SpaceXAI | Alibaba |
| Release Date | Feb 19, 2025 | Oct 21, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | 82.7 tok/s |
| TTFT | — | 1056ms |
| Latency | — | 1056ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 16.3 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 47.0 | 44.2 |
| Intelligence | 18.4 | 11.1 |
| Math | 58.0 | 68.3 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 69.3% | 67.1% |
| MMLU Pro | 79.9% | 79.1% |
| HLE | 5.1% | 6.3% |
| LiveCodeBench | 42.5% | 51.4% |
| MATH 500 | 87.0% | — |
| AIME 2025 | 58.0% | 68.3% |
| AIME (Original) | 33.0% | — |
| SciCode | 36.8% | 30.1% |
| LCR | 54.7% | 31.3% |
| IFBench | 46.9% | 39.2% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 48.8% | 29.2% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 11.4% | 8.3% |
Key Takeaways
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct offers the best value at $0.70/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Grok 3 has the strongest reasoning profile with a 47.0 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Grok 3
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
