Grok Voice Agent vs Grok-1

Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · xAI

Most Affordable
xAI logo
Grok Voice Agent
$0.00/1M
Price Difference
NaNx
input cost range
Metric
xAI logo Grok Voice Agent
xAI
xAI logo Grok-1
xAI
Pricing
Per 1M tokens
Input Cost $0.00/1M $0.00/1M
Output Cost $0.00/1M $0.00/1M
Specifications
Organization Model creator
xAI xAI
Release Date Launch date
Dec 17, 2025 Mar 17, 2024
Performance & Speed
Throughput Output speed
Time to First Token (TTFT) Initial response delay
Latency Time to first answer token
Composite Indices
Intelligence Index Overall reasoning capability
11.7
Coding Index Programming ability
Math Index Mathematical reasoning
Standard Benchmarks
GPQA Graduate-level reasoning
MMLU Pro Advanced knowledge
HLE Hard language evaluation
LiveCodeBench Real-world coding tasks
MATH 500 Mathematical problems
AIME 2025 Advanced math competition
AIME (Original) Math olympiad problems
SciCode Scientific code generation
LCR Code review capability
IFBench Instruction-following
TAU-bench v2 Tool use & agentic tasks
TerminalBench Hard CLI command generation

Key Takeaways

Grok Voice Agent offers the best value at $0.00/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.

All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.

When to Choose Each Model

xAI logo

Grok Voice Agent

  • Cost-sensitive applications
  • High-volume processing
xAI logo

Grok-1

  • General-purpose AI
  • Versatile applications

Cost Calculator

xAI logo Grok Voice Agent
$0.00
per month
xAI logo Grok-1
$0.00
per month

Costs are estimates based on API pricing. Actual costs may vary based on caching, batch processing, and volume discounts.

AI Model Comparison Guide

Compare large language models (LLMs) side-by-side with detailed benchmark scores, pricing, and performance metrics. Our interactive comparison tool helps you evaluate AI models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta, DeepSeek, and other leading providers. Use our AI model leaderboard to discover more models to compare.

Understanding Composite Indices

  • Intelligence Index: Aggregated score combining MMLU-Pro, GPQA, and HLE benchmarks - measures overall reasoning and knowledge capabilities
  • Coding Index: Composite metric from LiveCodeBench, SciCode, and LiveCodeBench Review - evaluates programming proficiency across multiple languages
  • Math Index: Combined score from AIME, AIME 2025, and MATH-500 benchmarks - assesses mathematical reasoning from high school to competition level

Key Comparison Metrics

  • Benchmark Scores: Standardized tests measuring intelligence, coding, math, and specialized capabilities - higher percentages indicate better performance
  • Pricing Analysis: Compare input and output token costs across models - critical for budgeting API usage and scaling applications
  • Performance Metrics: Throughput (tokens/second) and latency measurements for real-time application planning
  • Context Windows: Maximum token capacity for processing documents and maintaining conversation history

How to Compare AI Models Effectively

Performance vs Cost

Balance benchmark scores against token pricing - flagship models offer 10-15% better performance but cost 5-10x more than smaller alternatives

Task-Specific Selection

Prioritize relevant indices: coding index for development tasks, math index for STEM applications, intelligence index for general reasoning

Real-World Testing

Use our free AI chat interface to test models with your specific prompts before committing to API integration

All benchmark scores, pricing data, and performance metrics are sourced from Artificial Analysis and updated daily. Compare models by intelligence, coding ability, math performance, speed, cost, or release date using our comprehensive AI model leaderboard.