Model Comparison
Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)
vs. Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B
Comparing 2 AI models · 11 benchmarks · MoonshotAI, Alibaba
Recommended Pick
Mo Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning) 6 metric wins Strongest on: Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence
Lowest Price
Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)
42.8 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)
25.8 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning).
Reasoning gap
Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning) leads Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B by 18.8 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning) wins 6 measurable categories, including Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence, GPQA.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)
MoonshotAI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Mo Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning) | Al Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.60/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $3.00/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.20/1M | — |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | MoonshotAI | Alibaba |
| Release Date | Jan 27, 2026 | Sep 19, 2024 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 37.9 tok/s | — |
| TTFT | 1320ms | — |
| Latency | 1320ms | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | — |
| Reasoning Score | 42.8 | 24.0 |
| Intelligence | 37.3 | 10.0 |
| Coding | 25.8 | — |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 78.9% | 33.9% |
| MMLU Pro | — | 47.3% |
| HLE | 12.3% | 4.8% |
| LiveCodeBench | — | 12.6% |
| MATH 500 | — | 66.0% |
| AIME (Original) | — | 5.3% |
| SciCode | 39.6% | 14.8% |
| LCR | 59.0% | — |
| IFBench | 43.7% | — |
| TAU-bench v2 | 81.3% | — |
| TerminalBench Hard | 18.9% | — |
Key Takeaways
Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B offers the best value at $0.00/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 42.8 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning) reaches a 25.8 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
