Model Comparison
LFM2 24B A2B
vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Comparing 2 AI models · 7 benchmarks · Liquid AI, Google
Recommended Pick
Go Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 11 metric wins Strongest on: Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence
Best Value
LFM2 24B A2B
100.0 value score
20.8 reasoning / $0.05/1M
Lowest Price
LFM2 24B A2B
$0.03/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
65.3 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
55.5 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
LFM2 24B A2B has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
LFM2 24B A2B is 66.7x cheaper on input tokens than Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview.
Speed gap
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview generates about 1.1x as many tokens per second as LFM2 24B A2B.
Reasoning gap
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads LFM2 24B A2B by 44.6 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads LFM2 24B A2B by 51.9 points on coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
LFM2 24B A2B
Liquid AI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Li LFM2 24B A2B | Top Pick Go Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.03/1M | $2.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.12/1M | $12.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.05/1M | $4.50/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Liquid AI | |
| Release Date | Feb 25, 2026 | Feb 19, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 118.3 tok/s | 131.4 tok/s |
| TTFT | 299ms | 26995ms |
| Latency | 299ms | 26995ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 3.7 |
| Reasoning Score | 20.8 | 65.3 |
| Intelligence | 10.5 | 57.2 |
| Coding | 3.6 | 55.5 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 47.4% | 94.1% |
| HLE | 4.4% | 44.7% |
| SciCode | 10.9% | 58.9% |
| LCR | 0.0% | 72.7% |
| IFBench | 45.9% | 77.1% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 11.1% | 95.6% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 0.0% | 53.8% |
Key Takeaways
LFM2 24B A2B offers the best value at $0.03/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has the strongest reasoning profile with a 65.3 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview reaches a 55.5 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
LFM2 24B A2B
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
