Model Comparison
LFM2 8B A1B
vs. Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B
Comparing 2 AI models · 12 benchmarks · Liquid AI, Alibaba
Recommended Pick
Al Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B 6 metric wins Strongest on: Reasoning, Intelligence, GPQA
Lowest Price
LFM2 8B A1B
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B
31.0 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
LFM2 8B A1B
2.3 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Reasoning gap
Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B leads LFM2 8B A1B by 11.6 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B wins 6 measurable categories, including Reasoning, Intelligence, GPQA, MMLU Pro.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
LFM2 8B A1B
Liquid AI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Li LFM2 8B A1B | Top Pick Al Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.00/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.00/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Liquid AI | Alibaba |
| Release Date | Oct 7, 2025 | Sep 19, 2024 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | — |
| TTFT | — | — |
| Latency | — | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Reasoning Score | 19.4 | 31.0 |
| Intelligence | 7.0 | 13.2 |
| Coding | 2.3 | — |
| Math | 25.3 | — |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 34.4% | 46.6% |
| MMLU Pro | 50.5% | 69.7% |
| HLE | 4.9% | 3.8% |
| LiveCodeBench | 15.1% | 24.8% |
| MATH 500 | — | 80.5% |
| AIME 2025 | 25.3% | — |
| AIME (Original) | — | 11.0% |
| SciCode | 6.8% | 22.9% |
| LCR | 0.0% | — |
| IFBench | 26.3% | — |
| TAU-bench v2 | 10.5% | — |
| TerminalBench Hard | 0.0% | — |
Key Takeaways
LFM2 8B A1B offers the best value at $0.00/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B has the strongest reasoning profile with a 31.0 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
LFM2 8B A1B reaches a 2.3 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
LFM2 8B A1B
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Code generation
- Software development
Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
