Model Comparison

Llama 3.2 Instruct 1B
vs. Step 3.5 Flash

Comparing 2 AI models · 6 benchmarks · Meta, StepFun

Chat with Llama & Step

Most Affordable

Meta logo Llama 3.2 Instruct 1B

$0.10/1M

Highest Intelligence

StepFun logo Step 3.5 Flash

83.1% GPQA

Best for Coding

StepFun logo Step 3.5 Flash

31.6 Coding Index

Price Difference

1.0x

input cost range

Composite Indices

Intelligence, Coding, Math

Standard Benchmarks

Academic and industry benchmarks

Benchmark Winners

6 tests
Meta logo

Llama 3.2 Instruct 1B

4
  • MMLU Pro
  • LiveCodeBench
  • MATH 500
  • AIME 2025
StepFun logo

Step 3.5 Flash

2
  • GPQA
  • HLE
Metric
Meta logo Llama 3.2 Instruct 1B
Meta
StepFun logo Step 3.5 Flash
StepFun
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input Cost $0.10/1M$0.10/1M
Output Cost $0.10/1M$0.30/1M
Blended (3:1) $0.10/1M $0.15/1M
Specifications
Organization MetaStepFun
Release Date Sep 25, 2024Feb 2, 2026
Performance & Speed
Throughput 144.1 tok/s85.5 tok/s
TTFT 526ms2416ms
Latency 526ms25816ms
Composite Indices
Intelligence 6.337.8
Coding 0.631.6
Math
Standard Benchmarks
GPQA 19.6%83.1%
MMLU Pro 20.0%
HLE 5.3%19.1%
LiveCodeBench 1.9%
MATH 500 14.0%
AIME 2025 0.0%
AIME (Original) 0.0%
SciCode 1.7%40.4%
LCR 5.0%43.0%
IFBench 22.8%64.6%
TAU-bench v2 0.0%94.4%
TerminalBench Hard 0.0%27.3%

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.2 Instruct 1B offers the best value at $0.10/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.

Step 3.5 Flash leads in reasoning capabilities with a 83.1% GPQA, excelling at complex analytical tasks and problem-solving.

Step 3.5 Flash reaches a 31.6 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.

All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.

When to Choose Each Model

Meta logo

Llama 3.2 Instruct 1B

  • Cost-sensitive applications
  • High-volume processing
StepFun logo

Step 3.5 Flash

  • Complex reasoning tasks
  • Research & analysis
  • Code generation
  • Software development
EU Made in Europe

Chat with 100+ AI Models in one App.

Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, GLM-5, Kimi K2.5 and many more.

AI Model Comparison Guide

Compare large language models (LLMs) side-by-side with detailed benchmark scores, pricing, and performance metrics. Our interactive comparison tool helps you evaluate AI models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta, DeepSeek, and other leading providers. Use our AI model leaderboard to discover more models to compare.

Understanding Composite Indices

  • Intelligence Index: Aggregated score combining MMLU-Pro, GPQA, and HLE benchmarks - measures overall reasoning and knowledge capabilities
  • Coding Index: Composite metric from LiveCodeBench, SciCode, and LiveCodeBench Review - evaluates programming proficiency across multiple languages
  • Math Index: Combined score from AIME, AIME 2025, and MATH-500 benchmarks - assesses mathematical reasoning from high school to competition level

Key Comparison Metrics

  • Benchmark Scores: Standardized tests measuring intelligence, coding, math, and specialized capabilities - higher percentages indicate better performance
  • Pricing Analysis: Compare input and output token costs across models - critical for budgeting API usage and scaling applications
  • Performance Metrics: Throughput (tokens/second) and latency measurements for real-time application planning
  • Context Windows: Maximum token capacity for processing documents and maintaining conversation history

How to Compare AI Models Effectively

Performance vs Cost

Balance benchmark scores against token pricing - flagship models offer 10-15% better performance but cost 5-10x more than smaller alternatives

Task-Specific Selection

Prioritize relevant indices: coding index for development tasks, math index for STEM applications, intelligence index for general reasoning

Real-World Testing

Use our free AI chat interface to test models with your specific prompts before committing to API integration

All benchmark scores, pricing data, and performance metrics are sourced from Artificial Analysis and updated daily. Compare models by intelligence, coding ability, math performance, speed, cost, or release date using our comprehensive AI model leaderboard.