Model Comparison
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
vs. MiMo-V2.5
Comparing 2 AI models · 7 benchmarks · Xiaomi
Recommended Pick
Xi MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) 9 metric wins Strongest on: Value, Input price, Blended price
Best Value
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
100.0 value score
48.3 reasoning / $0.15/1M
Lowest Price
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
$0.10/1M input price
Best Reasoning
MiMo-V2.5
53.0 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
MiMo-V2.5
42.1 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) is 1.4x cheaper on input tokens than MiMo-V2.5.
Speed gap
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) generates about 1.6x as many tokens per second as MiMo-V2.5.
Reasoning gap
MiMo-V2.5 leads MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) by 4.7 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
MiMo-V2.5 leads MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) by 8.6 points on coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
Xiaomi
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
MiMo-V2.5
Xiaomi
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Xi MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) | Xi MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.10/1M | $0.14/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.30/1M | $0.28/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.15/1M | $0.18/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Release Date | Dec 16, 2025 | Apr 22, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 127.7 tok/s | 81.7 tok/s |
| TTFT | 1473ms | 2173ms |
| Latency | 17131ms | 26646ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 94.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 48.3 | 53.0 |
| Intelligence | 41.5 | 49.0 |
| Coding | 33.5 | 42.1 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 83.5% | 84.9% |
| HLE | 20.0% | 25.2% |
| SciCode | 38.3% | 43.1% |
| LCR | 64.3% | 62.7% |
| IFBench | 71.8% | 67.1% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 93.3% | 90.6% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 31.1% | 41.7% |
Key Takeaways
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) offers the best value at $0.10/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
MiMo-V2.5 has the strongest reasoning profile with a 53.0 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
MiMo-V2.5 reaches a 42.1 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
MiMo-V2.5
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
