Model Comparison
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
vs. Nanbeige4.1-3B
Comparing 2 AI models · 7 benchmarks · Xiaomi, Nanbeige
Recommended Pick
Xi MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) 10 metric wins Strongest on: Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence
Lowest Price
Nanbeige4.1-3B
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
48.3 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
33.5 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
Nanbeige4.1-3B is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026).
Reasoning gap
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) leads Nanbeige4.1-3B by 11.3 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) leads Nanbeige4.1-3B by 24.6 points on coding.
Top-pick rationale
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) wins 10 measurable categories, including Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence, Coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
Xiaomi
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Nanbeige4.1-3B
Nanbeige
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Xi MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) | Na Nanbeige4.1-3B |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.10/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.30/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.15/1M | — |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Xiaomi | Nanbeige |
| Release Date | Dec 16, 2025 | Feb 11, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 148.3 tok/s | — |
| TTFT | 1263ms | — |
| Latency | 14748ms | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | — |
| Reasoning Score | 48.3 | 37.0 |
| Intelligence | 41.5 | 16.1 |
| Coding | 33.5 | 8.9 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 83.5% | 84.9% |
| HLE | 20.0% | 10.0% |
| SciCode | 38.3% | 26.6% |
| LCR | 64.3% | 0.0% |
| IFBench | 71.8% | 35.4% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 93.3% | 21.6% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 31.1% | 0.0% |
Key Takeaways
Nanbeige4.1-3B offers the best value at $0.00/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 48.3 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) reaches a 33.5 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
Nanbeige4.1-3B
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
