Model Comparison
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
vs. Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL (Reasoning)
Comparing 2 AI models · 10 benchmarks · Xiaomi, NVIDIA
Recommended Pick
Xi MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) 14 metric wins Strongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
100.0 value score
48.3 reasoning / $0.15/1M
Lowest Price
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
$0.10/1M input price
Best Reasoning
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
48.3 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
33.5 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) is 2.0x cheaper on input tokens than Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL (Reasoning).
Speed gap
Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL (Reasoning) generates about 2.3x as many tokens per second as MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026).
Reasoning gap
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) leads Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL (Reasoning) by 2.9 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) leads Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL (Reasoning) by 21.8 points on coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
Xiaomi
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL (Reasoning)
NVIDIA
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Xi MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) | NV Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL (Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.10/1M | $0.20/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.30/1M | $0.60/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.15/1M | $0.30/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Xiaomi | NVIDIA |
| Release Date | Dec 16, 2025 | Oct 28, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 118.0 tok/s | 274.9 tok/s |
| TTFT | 1431ms | 256ms |
| Latency | 18373ms | 7530ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 47.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 48.3 | 45.5 |
| Intelligence | 41.5 | 14.9 |
| Coding | 33.5 | 11.7 |
| Math | — | 75.0 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 83.5% | 57.2% |
| MMLU Pro | — | 75.9% |
| HLE | 20.0% | 5.3% |
| LiveCodeBench | — | 69.4% |
| AIME 2025 | — | 75.0% |
| SciCode | 38.3% | 26.2% |
| LCR | 64.3% | 40.0% |
| IFBench | 71.8% | 31.9% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 93.3% | 21.3% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 31.1% | 4.5% |
Key Takeaways
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) offers the best value at $0.10/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 48.3 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) reaches a 33.5 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL (Reasoning)
- General-purpose AI
- Versatile applications
