Model Comparison
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
vs. Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct
Comparing 2 AI models · 11 benchmarks · Xiaomi, Microsoft
Recommended Pick
Xi MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) 6 metric wins Strongest on: Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence
Lowest Price
Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
48.3 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
33.5 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026).
Speed gap
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) generates about 7.1x as many tokens per second as Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct.
Reasoning gap
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) leads Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct by 23.4 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) wins 6 measurable categories, including Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence, GPQA.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
Xiaomi
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct
Microsoft
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Xi MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) | Mi Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.10/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.30/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.15/1M | — |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Xiaomi | Microsoft |
| Release Date | Dec 16, 2025 | Feb 26, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 118.0 tok/s | 16.6 tok/s |
| TTFT | 1431ms | 883ms |
| Latency | 18373ms | 883ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | — |
| Reasoning Score | 48.3 | 24.9 |
| Intelligence | 41.5 | 10.0 |
| Coding | 33.5 | — |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 83.5% | 31.5% |
| MMLU Pro | — | 48.5% |
| HLE | 20.0% | 4.4% |
| LiveCodeBench | — | 13.1% |
| MATH 500 | — | 69.3% |
| AIME (Original) | — | 9.3% |
| SciCode | 38.3% | 11.0% |
| LCR | 64.3% | — |
| IFBench | 71.8% | — |
| TAU-bench v2 | 93.3% | — |
| TerminalBench Hard | 31.1% | — |
Key Takeaways
Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct offers the best value at $0.00/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 48.3 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) reaches a 33.5 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
