Model Comparison
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Comparing 2 AI models · 7 benchmarks · Xiaomi, Google
Recommended Pick
Go Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 10 metric wins Strongest on: Throughput, Latency, Reasoning
Best Value
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
100.0 value score
54.2 reasoning / $0.54/1M
Lowest Price
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
$0.43/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
61.8 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
55.5 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is 4.6x cheaper on input tokens than Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview.
Speed gap
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview generates about 3.1x as many tokens per second as MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
Reasoning gap
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads MiMo-V2.5-Pro by 7.6 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads MiMo-V2.5-Pro by 10.0 points on coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Xiaomi
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Xi MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Top Pick Go Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.43/1M | $2.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.87/1M | $12.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.54/1M | $4.50/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Xiaomi | |
| Release Date | Apr 22, 2026 | Feb 19, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 40.7 tok/s | 126.8 tok/s |
| TTFT | 1974ms | 29759ms |
| Latency | 51104ms | 29759ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 13.8 |
| Reasoning Score | 54.2 | 61.8 |
| Intelligence | 42.2 | 46.5 |
| Coding | 45.5 | 55.5 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 86.6% | 94.1% |
| HLE | 33.8% | 44.7% |
| SciCode | 50.2% | 58.9% |
| LCR | 73.3% | 72.7% |
| IFBench | 79.9% | 77.1% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 94.2% | 95.6% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 43.2% | 53.8% |
Key Takeaways
MiMo-V2.5-Pro offers the best value at $0.43/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has the strongest reasoning profile with a 61.8 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview reaches a 55.5 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
