Model Comparison
Small 4 (Reasoning)
vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Comparing 2 AI models · 7 benchmarks · Mistral, Google
Recommended Pick
Go Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 10 metric wins Strongest on: Reasoning, Intelligence, Coding
Best Value
Small 4 (Reasoning)
100.0 value score
38.1 reasoning / $0.26/1M
Lowest Price
Small 4 (Reasoning)
$0.15/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
65.3 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
55.5 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
Small 4 (Reasoning) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Small 4 (Reasoning) is 13.3x cheaper on input tokens than Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview.
Speed gap
Small 4 (Reasoning) generates about 1.4x as many tokens per second as Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview.
Reasoning gap
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads Small 4 (Reasoning) by 27.3 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads Small 4 (Reasoning) by 31.2 points on coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Small 4 (Reasoning)
Mistral
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Mi Small 4 (Reasoning) | Top Pick Go Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.15/1M | $2.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.60/1M | $12.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.26/1M | $4.50/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Mistral | |
| Release Date | Mar 16, 2026 | Feb 19, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 170.5 tok/s | 120.2 tok/s |
| TTFT | 497ms | 23928ms |
| Latency | 12228ms | 23928ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 10.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 38.1 | 65.3 |
| Intelligence | 27.8 | 57.2 |
| Coding | 24.3 | 55.5 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 76.9% | 94.1% |
| HLE | 9.5% | 44.7% |
| SciCode | 38.0% | 58.9% |
| LCR | 44.7% | 72.7% |
| IFBench | 48.2% | 77.1% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 41.2% | 95.6% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 17.4% | 53.8% |
Key Takeaways
Small 4 (Reasoning) offers the best value at $0.15/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has the strongest reasoning profile with a 65.3 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview reaches a 55.5 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Small 4 (Reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
