Model Comparison
Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh)
vs. M3
Comparing 2 AI models · 7 benchmarks · Meta, MiniMax
Recommended Pick
MeMuse Spark 1.1 (xhigh)8 metric winsStrongest on: Throughput, TTFT, Latency
Best Value
M3
100.0 value score
58.1 reasoning / $0.52/1M
Lowest Price
M3
$0.30/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh)
61.8 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh)
71.3 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
M3 has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
M3 is 4.2x cheaper on input tokens than Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh).
Speed gap
Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh) generates about 1.2x as many tokens per second as M3.
Reasoning gap
Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh) leads M3 by 3.7 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh) leads M3 by 12.7 points on coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh)
Meta
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
M3
MiniMax
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Me Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh) | Mi M3 |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $1.25/1M | $0.30/1M |
| Output Cost | $4.25/1M | $1.20/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $2.00/1M | $0.52/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Meta | MiniMax |
| Release Date | Jul 9, 2026 | Jun 1, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 127.8 tok/s | 107.2 tok/s |
| TTFT | 911ms | 1440ms |
| Latency | 16559ms | 20090ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 27.9 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 61.8 | 58.1 |
| Intelligence | 50.6 | 44.4 |
| Coding | 71.3 | 58.6 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 89.8% | 92.9% |
| HLE | 45.1% | 37.1% |
| SciCode | 58.2% | 45.4% |
| LCR | 63.3% | 74.0% |
| IFBench | — | 82.9% |
| TAU-bench v2 | — | 88.9% |
| TerminalBench Hard | — | 42.4% |
Key Takeaways
M3 offers the best value at $0.30/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 61.8 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh) reaches a 71.3 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
M3
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
