o1 vs Claude 4.1 Opus (Reasoning)

Comparing 2 AI models · 6 benchmarks · OpenAI, Anthropic

Most Affordable
OpenAI logo
o1
$15.00/1M
Highest Intelligence
Anthropic logo
Claude 4.1 Opus (Reasoning)
80.9% GPQA
Best for Coding
Anthropic logo
Claude 4.1 Opus (Reasoning)
46.1 Coding Index
Price Difference
1.0x
input cost range

Composite Indices

Intelligence, Coding, Math

Standard Benchmarks

Academic and industry benchmarks

Benchmark Winners

6 tests
OpenAI logo

o1

2
  • LiveCodeBench
  • MATH 500
Anthropic logo

Claude 4.1 Opus (Reasoning)

4
  • GPQA
  • MMLU Pro
  • HLE
  • AIME 2025
Metric
OpenAI logo o1
OpenAI
Anthropic logo Claude 4.1 Opus (Reasoning)
Anthropic
Pricing
Per 1M tokens
Input Cost $15.00/1M $15.00/1M
Output Cost $60.00/1M $75.00/1M
Blended Cost 3:1 input/output ratio
$26.25/1M $30.00/1M
Specifications
Organization Model creator
OpenAI Anthropic
Release Date Launch date
Dec 5, 2024 Aug 5, 2025
Performance & Speed
Throughput Output speed
166.4 tok/s 42.4 tok/s
Time to First Token (TTFT) Initial response delay
12245ms 1449ms
Latency Time to first answer token
12245ms 48641ms
Composite Indices
Intelligence Index Overall reasoning capability
47.2 59.3
Coding Index Programming ability
38.6 46.1
Math Index Mathematical reasoning
80.3
Standard Benchmarks
GPQA Graduate-level reasoning
74.7% 80.9%
MMLU Pro Advanced knowledge
84.1% 88.0%
HLE Hard language evaluation
7.7% 11.9%
LiveCodeBench Real-world coding tasks
67.9% 65.4%
MATH 500 Mathematical problems
97.0%
AIME 2025 Advanced math competition
80.3%
AIME (Original) Math olympiad problems
72.3%
SciCode Scientific code generation
35.8% 40.9%
LCR Code review capability
66.3%
IFBench Instruction-following
55.4%
TAU-bench v2 Tool use & agentic tasks
62.6% 71.4%
TerminalBench Hard CLI command generation
12.1% 32.1%

Key Takeaways

o1 offers the best value at $15.00/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.