Model Comparison
Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct
vs. Solar Pro 2 (Preview) (Non-reasoning)
Comparing 2 AI models · 11 benchmarks · Allen Institute for AI, Upstage
Recommended Pick
UpSolar Pro 2 (Preview) (Non-reasoning)4 metric winsStrongest on: Reasoning, Intelligence, GPQA
Lowest Price
Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Solar Pro 2 (Preview) (Non-reasoning)
37.0 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Reasoning gap
Solar Pro 2 (Preview) (Non-reasoning) leads Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct by 15.2 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Solar Pro 2 (Preview) (Non-reasoning) wins 4 measurable categories, including Reasoning, Intelligence, GPQA, SciCode.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct
Allen Institute for AI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Solar Pro 2 (Preview) (Non-reasoning)
Upstage
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Al Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct | Top Pick Up Solar Pro 2 (Preview) (Non-reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.00/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.00/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Allen Institute for AI | Upstage |
| Release Date | Jan 13, 2026 | May 20, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | — |
| TTFT | — | — |
| Latency | — | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Reasoning Score | 21.8 | 37.0 |
| Intelligence | 6.5 | 10.0 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 53.9% | 54.4% |
| MMLU Pro | — | 72.5% |
| HLE | 4.9% | 3.8% |
| LiveCodeBench | — | 38.5% |
| MATH 500 | — | 87.1% |
| AIME (Original) | — | 29.7% |
| SciCode | 16.7% | 27.2% |
| LCR | 0.0% | — |
| IFBench | 39.2% | — |
| TAU-bench v2 | 21.3% | — |
| TerminalBench Hard | 0.0% | — |
Key Takeaways
Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct offers the best value at $0.00/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Solar Pro 2 (Preview) (Non-reasoning) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 37.0 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Solar Pro 2 (Preview) (Non-reasoning)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
