Model Comparison
Olmo 3.1 32B Think
vs. Sonar Reasoning Pro
Comparing 2 AI models · 12 benchmarks · Allen Institute for AI, Perplexity
Recommended Pick
PeSonar Reasoning Pro2 metric winsStrongest on: Reasoning, Intelligence
Lowest Price
Olmo 3.1 32B Think
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Sonar Reasoning Pro
64.2 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Reasoning gap
Sonar Reasoning Pro leads Olmo 3.1 32B Think by 18.6 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Sonar Reasoning Pro wins 2 measurable categories, including Reasoning, Intelligence.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Olmo 3.1 32B Think
Allen Institute for AI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Sonar Reasoning Pro
Perplexity
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Al Olmo 3.1 32B Think | Top Pick Pe Sonar Reasoning Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.00/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.00/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Allen Institute for AI | Perplexity |
| Release Date | Dec 12, 2025 | Jan 28, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | — |
| TTFT | — | — |
| Latency | — | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Reasoning Score | 45.6 | 64.2 |
| Intelligence | 8.1 | 17.8 |
| Math | 77.3 | — |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 59.1% | — |
| MMLU Pro | 76.3% | — |
| HLE | 6.0% | — |
| LiveCodeBench | 69.5% | — |
| MATH 500 | — | 95.7% |
| AIME 2025 | 77.3% | — |
| AIME (Original) | — | 79.0% |
| SciCode | 29.3% | — |
| LCR | 0.0% | — |
| IFBench | 66.0% | — |
| TAU-bench v2 | 0.0% | — |
| TerminalBench Hard | 0.0% | — |
Key Takeaways
Olmo 3.1 32B Think offers the best value at $0.00/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Sonar Reasoning Pro has the strongest reasoning profile with a 64.2 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Olmo 3.1 32B Think
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Sonar Reasoning Pro
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
Recommended Comparisons
Popular alternatives
