Model Comparison
Olmo 3 7B Think
vs. Qwen3 4B 2507 (Reasoning)
Comparing 2 AI models · 10 benchmarks · Allen Institute for AI, Alibaba
Recommended Pick
AlQwen3 4B 2507 (Reasoning)13 metric winsStrongest on: Reasoning, Intelligence, Math
Lowest Price
Olmo 3 7B Think
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Qwen3 4B 2507 (Reasoning)
50.0 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Reasoning gap
Qwen3 4B 2507 (Reasoning) leads Olmo 3 7B Think by 9.5 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Qwen3 4B 2507 (Reasoning) wins 13 measurable categories, including Reasoning, Intelligence, Math, GPQA.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Olmo 3 7B Think
Allen Institute for AI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Qwen3 4B 2507 (Reasoning)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Al Olmo 3 7B Think | Top Pick Al Qwen3 4B 2507 (Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.00/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.00/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Allen Institute for AI | Alibaba |
| Release Date | Nov 20, 2025 | Aug 6, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | — |
| TTFT | — | — |
| Latency | — | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Reasoning Score | 40.5 | 50.0 |
| Intelligence | 4.0 | 12.0 |
| Math | 70.7 | 82.7 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 51.6% | 66.7% |
| MMLU Pro | 65.5% | 74.3% |
| HLE | 5.7% | 5.9% |
| LiveCodeBench | 61.7% | 64.1% |
| AIME 2025 | 70.7% | 82.7% |
| SciCode | 21.2% | 25.6% |
| LCR | 0.0% | 37.7% |
| IFBench | 41.5% | 49.8% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 0.0% | 25.4% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 0.8% | 1.5% |
Key Takeaways
Olmo 3 7B Think offers the best value at $0.00/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Qwen3 4B 2507 (Reasoning) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 50.0 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Olmo 3 7B Think
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Qwen3 4B 2507 (Reasoning)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
