Model Comparison
3.5 (1210)
vs. Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B
Comparing 2 AI models · 12 benchmarks · OpenChat, Alibaba
Recommended Pick
AlQwen2.5 Instruct 72B7 metric winsStrongest on: Reasoning, Intelligence, GPQA
Lowest Price
3.5 (1210)
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B
27.5 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
3.5 (1210) is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B.
Reasoning gap
Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B leads 3.5 (1210) by 15.2 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B wins 7 measurable categories, including Reasoning, Intelligence, GPQA, MMLU Pro.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
3.5 (1210)
OpenChat
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Op 3.5 (1210) | Top Pick Al Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.00/1M | $0.47/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.00/1M | $0.49/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | — | $0.48/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | OpenChat | Alibaba |
| Release Date | Dec 18, 2023 | Sep 19, 2024 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | — |
| TTFT | — | — |
| Latency | — | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | — | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 12.3 | 27.5 |
| Intelligence | 3.0 | 9.6 |
| Math | — | 14.0 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 23.0% | 49.1% |
| MMLU Pro | 31.0% | 72.0% |
| HLE | 4.8% | 4.2% |
| LiveCodeBench | 11.5% | 27.6% |
| MATH 500 | 30.7% | 85.8% |
| AIME 2025 | — | 14.0% |
| AIME (Original) | 0.0% | 16.0% |
| SciCode | — | 26.7% |
| LCR | — | 20.3% |
| IFBench | — | 36.9% |
| TAU-bench v2 | — | 34.5% |
| TerminalBench Hard | — | 4.5% |
Key Takeaways
3.5 (1210) offers the best value at $0.00/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B has the strongest reasoning profile with a 27.5 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
3.5 (1210)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
