Model Comparison
Qwen Chat 14B
vs. Step 3.7 Flash
Comparing 2 AI models · 7 benchmarks · Alibaba, StepFun
Recommended Pick
AlQwen Chat 14B4 metric winsStrongest on: Input price, Output price, TTFT
Lowest Price
Qwen Chat 14B
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Step 3.7 Flash
43.7 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Step 3.7 Flash
39.6 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
Qwen Chat 14B is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than Step 3.7 Flash.
Reasoning gap
Step 3.7 Flash leads Qwen Chat 14B by 41.6 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Qwen Chat 14B wins 4 measurable categories, including Input price, Output price, TTFT, Latency.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen Chat 14B
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Step 3.7 Flash
StepFun
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Al Qwen Chat 14B | St Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.00/1M | $0.20/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.00/1M | $1.15/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | — | $0.44/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | StepFun |
| Release Date | Sep 25, 2023 | May 29, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | 404.4 tok/s |
| TTFT | — | 691ms |
| Latency | — | 5636ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | — | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 2.1 | 43.7 |
| Intelligence | 2.1 | 30.3 |
| Coding | — | 39.6 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | — | 80.9% |
| HLE | — | 19.9% |
| SciCode | — | 40.0% |
| LCR | — | 63.7% |
| IFBench | — | 67.3% |
| TAU-bench v2 | — | 98.5% |
| TerminalBench Hard | — | 35.6% |
Key Takeaways
Qwen Chat 14B offers the best value at $0.00/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Step 3.7 Flash has the strongest reasoning profile with a 43.7 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Step 3.7 Flash reaches a 39.6 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen Chat 14B
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Step 3.7 Flash
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
