Model Comparison
Qwen2.5 Turbo
vs. Reka Flash 3
Comparing 2 AI models · 12 benchmarks · Alibaba, Reka AI
Recommended Pick
AlQwen2.5 Turbo8 metric winsStrongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
Qwen2.5 Turbo
100.0 value score
28.8 reasoning / $0.09/1M
Lowest Price
Qwen2.5 Turbo
$0.05/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Reka Flash 3
38.5 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
Qwen2.5 Turbo has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Qwen2.5 Turbo is 4.0x cheaper on input tokens than Reka Flash 3.
Speed gap
Qwen2.5 Turbo generates about 1.2x as many tokens per second as Reka Flash 3.
Reasoning gap
Reka Flash 3 leads Qwen2.5 Turbo by 9.7 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Qwen2.5 Turbo wins 8 measurable categories, including Value, Input price, Output price, Blended price.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen2.5 Turbo
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Reka Flash 3
Reka AI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Al Qwen2.5 Turbo | Re Reka Flash 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.05/1M | $0.20/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.20/1M | $0.80/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.09/1M | $0.35/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Reka AI |
| Release Date | Nov 18, 2024 | Mar 10, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 113.5 tok/s | 95.2 tok/s |
| TTFT | 1105ms | 30689ms |
| Latency | 1105ms | 51703ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 33.4 |
| Reasoning Score | 28.8 | 38.5 |
| Intelligence | 6.3 | 4.1 |
| Math | — | 33.7 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 41.0% | 52.9% |
| MMLU Pro | 63.3% | 66.9% |
| HLE | 4.2% | 5.1% |
| LiveCodeBench | 16.3% | 43.5% |
| MATH 500 | 80.5% | 89.3% |
| AIME 2025 | — | 33.7% |
| AIME (Original) | 12.0% | 51.0% |
| SciCode | 15.3% | 26.7% |
| LCR | — | 0.0% |
| IFBench | — | 30.4% |
| TAU-bench v2 | — | 0.0% |
| TerminalBench Hard | — | 0.0% |
Key Takeaways
Qwen2.5 Turbo offers the best value at $0.05/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Reka Flash 3 has the strongest reasoning profile with a 38.5 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen2.5 Turbo
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Reka Flash 3
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
