Model Comparison
Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B
vs. Qwen3 8B (Non-reasoning)
Comparing 2 AI models · 12 benchmarks · Alibaba
Recommended Pick
AlQwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B8 metric winsStrongest on: Input price, Output price, TTFT
Lowest Price
Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Qwen3 8B (Non-reasoning)
29.8 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3 8B (Non-reasoning).
Reasoning gap
Qwen3 8B (Non-reasoning) leads Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B by 1.6 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B wins 8 measurable categories, including Input price, Output price, TTFT, Latency.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Qwen3 8B (Non-reasoning)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Al Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B | Al Qwen3 8B (Non-reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.00/1M | $0.18/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.00/1M | $0.70/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | — | $0.31/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Alibaba |
| Release Date | Nov 11, 2024 | Apr 28, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | 64.9 tok/s |
| TTFT | — | 1414ms |
| Latency | — | 1414ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | — | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 28.3 | 29.8 |
| Intelligence | 7.1 | 5.1 |
| Math | — | 24.3 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 41.7% | 45.2% |
| MMLU Pro | 63.5% | 64.3% |
| HLE | 3.8% | 2.8% |
| LiveCodeBench | 29.5% | 20.2% |
| MATH 500 | 76.7% | 82.8% |
| AIME 2025 | — | 24.3% |
| AIME (Original) | 12.0% | 24.3% |
| SciCode | 27.1% | 16.8% |
| LCR | — | 0.0% |
| IFBench | — | 28.6% |
| TAU-bench v2 | — | 24.9% |
| TerminalBench Hard | — | 2.3% |
Key Takeaways
Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B offers the best value at $0.00/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Qwen3 8B (Non-reasoning) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 29.8 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Qwen3 8B (Non-reasoning)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
